Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-08
"Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com> Fri, 09 February 2024 18:20 UTC
Return-Path: <rgandhi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E07C14F619; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 10:20:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b="N3cpXEsG"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b="TPAKLEzl"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xaVxvmGwVomT; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 10:20:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3C05C14F605; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 10:20:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=30274; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1707502822; x=1708712422; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=sTfpP/gqJq+O3mvhbAk1Tec5F/jkmj5A/VOxMff3vUk=; b=N3cpXEsG0T9pEqqILLyjgqfAtzyll3va8Z1c+/ojppu53gd3SIePHvIv 6udedTYyzdblJED4Vqwawq3xMw/q6EN5dMWVUSK20kHpTYfj9rE5X0hyo xVsWMsEkzZ0JOPrurHLGai6HLyST/y8VklAS1bLC/f+Q/3zzFPYNPoDoa w=;
X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 4VVnMDSYTVWIb8nTUP6UBg==
X-CSE-MsgGUID: u6ZRgqIwSrWx3dmj9JPgnw==
X-IPAS-Result: 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
IronPort-PHdr: A9a23:29Ua2BdnN7R6g1N4mBP0NO/WlGM/eoqcDmcuAtIPkblCdOGk55v9e RGZ7vR2h1iPVoLeuLpIiOvT5rjpQndIoY2Av3YLbIFWWlcbhN8XkQ0tDI/NCUDyIPPwKS1vN M9DT1RiuXq8NBsdA97wMmXbuWb69jsOAlP6PAtxKP7yH9vIgM2x2+Cz05bSeA5PwjG6ZOA6I BC/tw6ErsANmsMiMvMrxxnEqWcAd+VNkGVvI1/S1xqp7car95kl+CNV088=
IronPort-Data: A9a23:EiXMJ6wWQfujRRKaR7p6t+c7xirEfRIJ4+MujC+fZmUNrF6WrkUPz jZNXW6Ab66KMGTyLdolPYSz9kME6pTQmIdgTgptrVhgHilAwSbn6Xt1DatR0we6dJCroJdPt p1GAjX4BJlpCCea/lH0auSJQUBUjcmgXqD7BPPPJhd/TAplTDZJoR94kobVuKYw6TSCK13L4 Y6aT/H3Ygf/h2YuajNMscpvlTs21BjMkGJA1rABTagjUG/2zxE9EJ8ZLKetGHr0KqE88jmSH rurIBmRpws1zj91Yj+Xuu+Tnn4iHtY+CTOzZk9+AMBOtPTtShsaic7XPNJEAateZq7gc9pZk L2hvrToIesl0zGldOk1C3Fl/y9C0aJupIH5J12Tiv2v8XLneSvq/8hWUnwcMthNkgp3KTkmG f0wMjsBaFWIgPi7he/9Qeh3jcNlJ87uVG8dkig/lneCUrB3GtaaHvuiCdxwhF/cguhUEv/Ya 8oYQTFudx/HJRZIPz/7DbpnzLjx3CaiL2MwRFS9uPQF2WfK7RNKyof9a9bQeI2ofcpTgRPNz o7B1z+kWk5BboP3JSC+2ne0gvTnnC7nVsQVDrLQ3uR2jxifx3Y7CRAKWx28u/bRt6Klc8hUJ 0pR8S00oO1vskeqVdL6GRa/pRZooyLwRfIMLdM8zS22+5bq3CeTVm44cwYfVfYp4ZpeqSMR6 neFmNbgBDpKubKTSG6A+rr8kd9UEXVKRYPlTXJUJTbp8+XeTJcPYgUjp+uP/YavhdHzXDr32 T3P8W41hq4YiogA0KDTEbH7b9CE+MShou0dv1m/soeZAuVRP9DNi2uAsgiz0Bq4BNzFJmRtR VBd8yRk0MgADIuWiAuGS/gXEbei6p6taWKE3gU/Q8l8rmX9pRZPmLy8BhkjdS+F1e5ZKFfUj LP752u9GbcKZST6M/UrC25PI5p0lMAM6ugJptiPM4IROcIuHON21CpvfkWXl3v8i1QhlLp3O JGQN66R4YUyV8xaIM6Nb75Fi9cDn3lmrUuKHMyT50r8i9K2OiXKIYrpxXPTNIjVGove/lWMm zueXuPXoyhivBrWOHmMqNFKfAFXdBDWx/ne8qRqSwJKGSI/cEkJAP7KyrRncItg95m5XM+Sl p1hcie0EGbCuEA=
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:Cq2VAq1NiZMYLgd+Kl//9AqjBf1xeYIsimQD101hICG9Lfbo9P xGzc566farslcssSkb6KG90cm7LU819fZOkPAs1MSZLXnbUQqTXc5fBO7Zsl/d8kLFh5NgPM tbAs9D4ZjLfCZHZKXBkUeF+rQbsaW6GcmT7I+0oQYJPGVXguNbnnhE422gYzVLrXx9dOAE/e 2nl7F6TlSbCBIqR/X+LEMoG8LEoNrGno/nZxkpOz4LgTPlsRqYrJTBP1y9xBkxbxNjqI1OzY HCqWPEz5Tml8v+5g7X1mfV4ZgTssDm0MF/CMuFjdVQAinwiy6zDb4RG4GqjXQQmqWC+VwqmN 7Dr1MLJMJo8U7ceWmzvF/ExxTg6jAz8HXvoGXowkcL4PaJBg7SOfAxwb6xQSGprHbIe+sMlp 6j6ljp8qa/yymwxRgVqeK4Dy2C3XDE0kbK2dRj/UC3F7FuKYO4aeckjRlo+FBqJlOg1Kk3VO ZpF83S//BQbBeTaG3YpHBmxJi2Um00BQrueDlJhiW56UkfoJlC9TpS+OUP2nMbsJ4tQZhN4O rJdqxuibFVV8cTKaZwHv0IT8e7AnHEBUukChPfHX33UKUcf37doZ/+57s4oOmsZZwT1ZM33J DMSklRu2I+c1/nTceOwJpI+BbQR3jVZ0Wh9uhOo5xi/rHsTrviNiOODFgojsu7uv0aRtbWXv 6iUagmSsML7VGeb7qh8zeOLKW6c0NuJfH9kuxLL26zng==
X-Talos-CUID: 9a23:5CWZjm0PgNW577BjGZM6aLxfRv4bdFjx90bsHXCZAzZvdICtF2K69/Yx
X-Talos-MUID: 9a23:2IHrdw12P1IUkjQIkkLvnqRmADUj/vqcMk8UsIo9ofaUbiB1OWa/tDuxXdpy
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2024 18:20:18 +0000
Received: from rcdn-opgw-5.cisco.com (rcdn-opgw-5.cisco.com [72.163.7.169]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 419IKIgp012763 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 9 Feb 2024 18:20:18 GMT
X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Zc6CV8ijQgyseQJ0s4xbzA==
X-CSE-MsgGUID: B9KPEa0nRQG7F3WX0eFwmA==
Authentication-Results: rcdn-opgw-5.cisco.com; dkim=pass (signature verified) header.i=@cisco.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=rgandhi@cisco.com; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) d=cisco.com
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,257,1701129600"; d="scan'208,217";a="2926244"
Received: from mail-mw2nam10lp2100.outbound.protection.outlook.com (HELO NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) ([104.47.55.100]) by rcdn-opgw-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2024 18:20:17 +0000
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PamWFSApGpKviJ6eL+x0aY+QJJbPfldvGhydFrAbKIZfnplCXzTE6zzM6Fy5wntlAg4JQHnGfWHITr1Id+b22hbQvlPI2mMBCSZTfYCnDAPv9HgCmKtCGJMEThOcoHaNdXvLV7c9kiRQdvaJQVx8uwjZYzsHgI96O/Z25GpD2Y5F6sGXHeTrApqeuc4sGJuELclIRjxu7yQ5ErW/mEDHWcL4HeSNm5EuqW9ERDtWKoKdJuUeEFolTNrWA5DSFmFgEWyGk/hEgp/nbuyeSIt1q0U/PjzPRgN4XGilIHd7qtALuWWH0CAgafGEUA3l1VWIYz8RsrkkrpWweD4jyqPv1A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=sTfpP/gqJq+O3mvhbAk1Tec5F/jkmj5A/VOxMff3vUk=; b=ABvOM/xTxbqHmxmwba3Vv3Apw7OulK+Be0wVy4tPd2bF7yC7ub6XaVkFx2Sf26mHgobyLUti2kyVMpZECCc5Lt+s7gdhWZn5AB1TKhLChGSKIVByNRIXr3SUpCWSGVScgJL6cwpE4oZqeg7G0Dvfc//L9q8z/7PO6+uQHYodS3OSl0No0x9P5gHNGXMHy8qsCRuKYFfsiFBHEHvMZ/gXCeBSLl4YzgjIsDqWffQgvUjLoXtPRYwHV68No15pGtzocOBXlFYNYdRMk3L0xLkpiYDlpIZ3XH9TzLBzLjPjnRKJe4LlDjP8+YT6KIOfIgxvPlycaaJYKIk6GC6rcjRizA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=sTfpP/gqJq+O3mvhbAk1Tec5F/jkmj5A/VOxMff3vUk=; b=TPAKLEzlGgkB4al1Uh4nVZiu4412hQ5WROn1L4pm47rN1CQ8HYJuzqcbm1I/j1EYU63hw23L8Mx6YEGzsoudN8jQq40EhbZhWpgBaUWKDtRuMw9fiWCXReUGUZSyHb4X51JWwJr5yPO46QzMt3c1paAbZSwNhg63bEeZ/rykCqw=
Received: from BL3PR11MB5731.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:352::15) by CO1PR11MB5042.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:99::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7270.27; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 18:20:15 +0000
Received: from BL3PR11MB5731.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4f80:1043:5bf1:8508]) by BL3PR11MB5731.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4f80:1043:5bf1:8508%5]) with mapi id 15.20.7270.025; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 18:20:14 +0000
From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>
To: Zhaohui Zhang <zzhang@juniper.net>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>
CC: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-08
Thread-Index: AQHZ2rplGANY0s1YpE6ruxLymgSEcLEDTN/x
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 18:20:14 +0000
Message-ID: <BL3PR11MB5731F024B956470B0F180778BF4B2@BL3PR11MB5731.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <169334219423.43666.11674402467293148118@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <169334219423.43666.11674402467293148118@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-CA, en-US
Content-Language: en-CA
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BL3PR11MB5731:EE_|CO1PR11MB5042:EE_
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cd561c6f-8ee8-45b8-6a76-08dc299bc31a
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: dUw7byjQ1OYwcIW8cAO7Fp/Ozc4qEpqucp4MGT9OPnzsBjlh17XYSRgZ/NkhqTfDHOEcEi/4oFl8XydwcUfU6j/uHKKGbT87qjVNRIA3f/PU4/6mBhm3ZV/A3OF9xNl1b+LTy4yECy5Upa+bXydbN0087obr1WvfAzb5kRXKx6w54IFdOZDYJi0Tnz9tNhd1MFlontmRqjANc1O+2//iDaLXrU5jDlcdy+1Z7bjwIj2jyByMUzOhFaQezyvvqJY7E8MXwvwIlt67cgBqyCpp6JxbVLos7RoK4Xa+k3hpxysWZDfsuVHrly9yDJXzg0f/Y1Qk2IIu4+afJOzrBM14W+Ho1OTRGDRVeAWi0wLmU4ubyo0dzG+mHxZlya+JwW40pzz96IA2Y5HZn6jDeFQu3EA0PfQhQYTjmDmQVEKPti2L/jnhi+zXaDUTeKxc415STxbYciOUT7RdidbbTE7+SHSaaogeiL27FjYlt809Lsz63wpcWPK+BE4t3LUXmvE3ufhnpr8oS2z53k4+cabuwqo8KEB1FiAiG1q1bOD8X183Ghc+6ORQs46J0UmS2eLQuDZckzdMJXh7xZfqQjeaMSBcwsngluJ0MnDrYvbbmt4=
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BL3PR11MB5731.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230031)(376002)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(366004)(346002)(230922051799003)(451199024)(1800799012)(64100799003)(186009)(166002)(33656002)(122000001)(38100700002)(38070700009)(55016003)(41300700001)(2906002)(53546011)(9686003)(966005)(71200400001)(110136005)(66446008)(91956017)(478600001)(76116006)(66476007)(66946007)(316002)(66556008)(7696005)(64756008)(54906003)(6506007)(83380400001)(86362001)(5660300002)(8676002)(8936002)(4326008)(52536014)(21615005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: 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
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BL3PR11MB5731F024B956470B0F180778BF4B2BL3PR11MB5731namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BL3PR11MB5731.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cd561c6f-8ee8-45b8-6a76-08dc299bc31a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Feb 2024 18:20:14.9487 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: ASuJzztE/ycPnNerqXyndov4LTUlAXG0Irm1TkUMT4jSkTIIYr6AY07uo33UpN16mjeCN29QSOZPwvEcgWe1MA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1PR11MB5042
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 72.163.7.169, rcdn-opgw-5.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/x1-I5vvJrjzAwMBDD59fx5rWHVA>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-08
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 18:20:28 -0000
Thanks, Jeffrey, for the detailed review. Apology for the delay in replying. We have posted a revised draft with suggested changes. HTML: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-09.html Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-09 Please see in line with replies tagged with <RG>…. From: Zhaohui Zhang via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Date: Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 4:50 PM To: rtg-dir@ietf.org <rtg-dir@ietf.org> Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr.all@ietf.org <draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr.all@ietf.org>, mpls@ietf.org <mpls@ietf.org> Subject: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-08 Reviewer: Zhaohui Zhang Review result: Has Issues General comment: The document name and title/subject (including the short title at each pager header) should have RFC6374 removed. It's better to be named as "Performance Measurement for SR-MPLS", because it is not only using RFC6374 but also 7876 and 9341. <RG> Updated. Some specific commnets: [RFC6374] specifies protocol mechanisms to enable the efficient and accurate measurement of performance metrics in MPLS networks using query and response messages. [RFC7876] specifies mechanisms for sending and processing out-of-band responses over an UDP return path when receiving RFC 6374 based query messages. These mechanisms are also well-suited in SR-MPLS networks. This document utilizes the mechanisms defined in [RFC6374] for Performance Delay and Loss Measurements in SR-MPLS networks, for both SR-MPLS links and end-to-end SR-MPLS paths including Policies. In addition, this document defines Return Path TLV and Block Number TLV extensions for [RFC6374]. Should mention RFC7876 and RFC9341 as well. <RG> Updated. For delay and loss measurement in SR-MPLS networks, the procedures defined in [RFC6374] are used in this document. Note that the one- way, two-way and round-trip delay measurements are defined in Section 2.4 of [RFC6374] and are further described in this document for SR-MPLS networks. Similarly, the packet loss measurement is defined in Section 2.2 of [RFC6374] and is further described in this document for SR-MPLS networks. My personal preference is not to repeat what is already described/specified in RFC6374. An implementation can't solely rely on this document but need to refer to RFC6374 and other RFCs anyway, so this document can just refer to those and point out differences. This will highlight the differences and reduces the chance of copy and paste errors - a good thing for authors, reviewers and implementors. <RG> Updated to remove various repetitions. I did not try to match the description between this document and the "base" RFCs. So far I have not seen many differences besides the following: - TTL - Return Path TLV, presumably only applicable to SR-MPLS - Block Number TLV, presumably not specific to SR-MPLS - SR-P2MP Am I missing anything? <RG> FYI, the draft also describes: 1. the one-way/two-way/LB modes as applied to SR-MPLS. 2. destination and source TLVs as applied to SR-MPLS. 3. Path segment for loss. SR is enabled with MPLS data plane on nodes Q1 and R1. The nodes Q1 and R1 may be directly connected via a link enabled with MPLS (Section 2.9.1 of [RFC6374]) or a Point-to-Point (P2P) SR-MPLS path [RFC8402]. The link may be a physical interface, virtual link, or Link Aggregation Group (LAG) [IEEE802.1AX], or LAG member link. The SR-MPLS path may be an SR-MPLS Policy [RFC9256] on node Q1 (called head-end) with destination to node R1 (called tail-end). The paragraph mentions "link". Is that the same as the "SR-MPLS link" used throughout the document? Is there a difference between "MPLS link" and "SR-MPLS" link when it comes to performance measurement? <RG> Updated to say link. It may be desired in SR-MPLS networks that the same path (same set of links and nodes) between the querier and responder be used in both directions of the measurement. This is achieved by using the SR-MPLS Return Path TLV extension defined in this document. Should "It may be ..." be changed to "If it is ..."? I don't see justification for "it may be desired". <RG> Updated. The packet loss measurement using Alternate-Marking Method defined in [RFC9341] requires collecting Block Number of the traffic counters. This is achieved by using the Block Number TLV extension defined in this document. In RFC9341, the wording is MAY not MUST or "required": <RG> Updated. The Alternate-Marking Method described in this document literally splits the packets of the measured flow into different measurement blocks. An implementation MAY use a Block Number (BN) for data correlation. Is it that Block Number TLV extension defined here is not SR-MPLS specific? Better to clarify. <RG> Updated for MPLS. A query message as shown in Figure 2 is sent over the SR-MPLS links for both delay and loss measurement using the procedures described in [RFC6374]. For SR-MPLS links, the TTL value MUST be set to 255 in the SR-MPLS header. SR-MPLS encapsulation (e.g., using adjacency SID of the link) can be added for transmitting the query messages for SR- MPLS links. Can you elaborate how adjacency SID can/should be used? If Q1 and R1 are "directly" connected via an (SR-)MPLS link, do you need any MPLS encapsulation, and in particular what adjacency SID does Q1 use? <RG> Updated to remove it. Note that in addition to the P2P SR-MPLS paths, the SR-MPLS Segment List Sub-TLV is also applicable to the P2MP SR-MPLS paths. For example, for P2MP SR-MPLS paths, it may only carry the Node Segment Identifier of the querier in order for the response to follow an SR- MPLS path back to the querier. Shojld the "may only carry" be "MUST only carry"? <RG> Updated to remove it. SR-P2MP policy documents are not mature yet. draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy is only about general concept and draft-ietf-idr-sr-p2mp-policy is only at -00 revision - not ready for WGLC. It's best to leave P2MP outside the scope of this document. <RG> Updated to remove it. Thanks, Rakesh
- [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-mpls-… Zhaohui Zhang via Datatracker
- Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-m… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-m… Tarek Saad
- Re: [RTG-DIR] [mpls] Rtgdir early review of draft… Tony Li
- Re: [RTG-DIR] [mpls] Rtgdir early review of draft… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-m… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang