Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] routing area design team on dataplane encapsulation considerations

[Chris Bowers <[e-mail]>]

I agree.  WG adoption poll sometimes triggers people to read a draft, so they might as well read the latest version if that is eminent.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 9:10 AM
To: Erik Nordmark
Cc: Chris Bowers; Larry Kreeger (kreeger); Alia Atlas; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] routing area design team on dataplane encapsulation considerations

Erik,

Please publish 02, we will review it as well as  ask for a Routing Directorate QA reviewer and poll WG in parallel.
Chris - what do you think?



Regards,
Jeff

> On May 8, 2015, at 11:38 PM, Erik Nordmark <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Chris,
> 
> When are you planning to do the WG adoption call?
> You could either do that now on -01, or wait for about 2 weeks and we will have a -02 out.
> 
> Thanks,
>   Erik
> 
>> On 5/8/15 5:42 AM, Chris Bowers wrote:
>> 
>> Larry,
>> 
>> I think it makes sense to leave the name as is until the poll for WG adoption takes place on the mailing list.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Chris
>> 
>> *From:*Larry Kreeger (kreeger) [mailto:[e-mail]]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, May 07, 2015 11:43 AM
>> *To:* Alia Atlas; [e-mail]; 
>> [e-mail]
>> *Subject:* Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] routing area design team 
>> on dataplane encapsulation considerations
>> 
>> OK, apparently there is no actual alias for routing-discussion-chairs.  Trying again with rtgwg-chairs.
>> 
>> *From: *Larry Kreeger <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> *Date: *Thursday, May 7, 2015 9:39 AM
>> *To: *"[e-mail] 
>> <mailto:[e-mail]>" 
>> <[e-mail] 
>> <mailto:[e-mail]>>, Alia Atlas 
>> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>, 
>> "[e-mail] 
>> <mailto:[e-mail]>" 
>> <[e-mail] 
>> <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> *Subject: *Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] routing area design team 
>> on dataplane encapsulation considerations
>> 
>> Hi RTGWG Chairs,
>> 
>> At the RTGWG meeting in Dallas, I thought it was decided for the WG to either adopt, or call to adopt this document.  Erik is getting ready to publish a new version.  Should he rename it as a WG draft before doing that?
>> 
>> Thanks, Larry
>> 
>> *From: *Alia Atlas <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> *Date: *Friday, March 13, 2015 1:16 PM
>> *To: *"[e-mail] 
>> <mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail] 
>> <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> *Subject: *Re: routing area design team on dataplane encapsulation 
>> considerations
>> 
>> This design team has delivered a internet-draft, draft-rtg-dt-encap-01.
>> 
>> This draft will be discussed in RTGWG at IETF 92.  I would encourage 
>> you to all
>> 
>> read it and send comments to rtgwg.  I'm certain that the draft will 
>> be refined
>> 
>> and improved.
>> 
>> I'd like to thank the design team for their excellent work in a short time-frame.
>> 
>> I hope that this draft encourages useful discussion and thought as we 
>> move forward
>> 
>> on various encapsulations.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Alia
>> 
>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Alia Atlas <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>> 
>>    I have chartered a Routing Area Design Team to work on data-plane
>>    encapsulation considerations.
>> 
>>    I've bcc'd nvo3, sfc, bier, and rtgwg as the most directly
>>    relevant.  Please keep any conversation in one place on
>>    routing-discussion.
>> 
>>    Erik Nordmark has kindly agreed to lead this design team.  The
>>    members of the design
>> 
>>    team are:
>> 
>>    Albert Tian <[e-mail]
>>    <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> 
>>    Erik Nordmark <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>      Jesse Gross <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>      Jon Hudson <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>      Larry Kreeger (kreeger) <[e-mail]
>>    <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>      Pankaj Garg <[e-mail]
>>    <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>      Pat Thaler <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>      Tom Herbert <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> 
>>    The mailing list, [e-mail]
>>    <mailto:[e-mail]>, is closed but the
>>    archives are
>> 
>>    publicly available at:
>> 
>>    
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/curr
>> ent/maillist.html
>> 
>>    The Design Team is chartered as follows:
>> 
>>    There have been multiple efforts over the years that have resulted
>>    in new or modified data plane behaviors involving encapsulations.
>>    That includes IETF efforts like MPLS, LISP, and TRILL but also
>>    industry efforts like Vxlan and NVGRE.  These collectively can be
>>    seen as a source of insight into the properties that data planes
>>    need to meet.  The IETF is currently working on potentially new
>>    encapsulations in NVO3 and SFC and considering working on BIER. In
>>    addition there is work on tunneling in the INT area.
>> 
>>    This is a short term design team chartered to collect and
>>    construct useful advice to parties working on new or modified data
>>    plane behaviors that include additional encapsulations.  The goal
>>    is for the group to document useful advice gathered from
>>    interacting with ongoing efforts.  An Internet Draft will be
>>    produced for IETF92 to capture that advice, which will be
>>    discussed in RTGWG.
>> 
>>    Data plane encapsulations face a set of common issues such as:
>> 
>>      * How to provide entropy for ECMP
>>      * Issues around packet size and fragmentation/reassembly
>>      * OAM - what support is needed in an encapsulation format?
>>      * Security and privacy.
>>      * QoS
>>      * Congestion Considerations
>>      * IPv6 header protection (non-zero UDP checksum over IPv6 issue)
>>      * Extensibility - e.g., for evolving OAM, security, and/or
>>    congestion control
>>      * Layering of multiple encapsulations e.g., SFC over NVO3 over 
>> BIER
>> 
>>    The design team will provide advice on those issues. The intention
>>    is that even where we have different encapsulations for different
>>    purposes carrying different data, each such encapsulation doesn't
>>    have to reinvent the wheel for the above common issues.
>> 
>>    The design team will look across the routing area in particular at
>>    SFC, NVO3 and BIER. It will not be involved in comparing or
>>    analyzing any particular encapsulation formats proposed in those
>>    WGs and BoFs but instead focus on common advice.
>> 
>>    Regards,
>> 
>>    Alia
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rtg-dt-encap-considerations mailing list 
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dt-encap-considerations
>