Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] How to better engage SFC?

Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com> Thu, 30 June 2016 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-ooam-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-ooam-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A1412D5B6 for <rtg-ooam-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 12:28:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.191
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.191 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id odpeMdqeVZGX for <rtg-ooam-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 12:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usplmg21.ericsson.net (usplmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5BD912D5B0 for <rtg-ooam-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 12:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c6180641-f796f6d000000e1e-95-5775728de10a
Received: from EUSAAHC001.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.75]) by usplmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F6.0C.03614.D8275775; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 21:27:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC001.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0294.000; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:28:13 -0400
From: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
To: Fioccola Giuseppe <giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it>, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net>, "rtg-ooam-dt@ietf.org" <rtg-ooam-dt@ietf.org>, 'Alia Atlas' <akatlas@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Rtg-ooam-dt] How to better engage SFC?
Thread-Index: AQHR0UsE8X9kCTJs7Eu8Rdc/3SAMY6AAaN6AgABwwhCAATTWAIAAVPTw
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:28:13 +0000
Message-ID: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221ABDF09@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
References: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221AB9C05@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <ed828c45-2964-0102-1530-5f9a5c5c9789@sonic.net> <eea738aa4d7e4a6a8d10231346c440e2@TELMBXC02BA020.telecomitalia.local> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221ABCCA0@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <6b5b1c05f045425b8fc41d2a04290c39@TELMBXC02BA020.telecomitalia.local>
In-Reply-To: <6b5b1c05f045425b8fc41d2a04290c39@TELMBXC02BA020.telecomitalia.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.9]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221ABDF09eusaamb103erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrPIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXSPt25vUWm4wYeLVhafHl5itti67CG7 xekbx5ksXnZuYLP417qX1eLVvy0sDmweO2fdZfdYsuQnk8fkhReZPb5u3s7q8bS7mcWj5Vwv ewBbFJdNSmpOZllqkb5dAlfGhxuzWApWrWGsaP5c08B4ZhpjFyMnh4SAicSsSTOYIWwxiQv3 1rN1MXJxCAkcZZSY9O8RK4SznFHi37TNYB1sAkYSLzb2sIMkRAS2MkrcebKMFSTBLJAk0bx7 IZgtDDT23sJVLCC2iICpxL8LPVC2m8Ti5afAalgEVCXezIdYzSvgK7H8wARGiG1XmCQmLdsE luAUCJJY83EGG4jNCHTf91NrmCCWiUvcejKfCeJuAYkle85D/SAq8fLxP1YIW1FiX/90doj6 fIm9xy9CLROUODnzCcsERtFZSEbNQlI2C0kZRFxP4sbUKWwQtrbEsoWvmSFsXYkZ/w6xIIsv YGRfxchRWlyQk5tuZLiJERitxyTYHHcw7u31PMQowMGoxMO7gKckXIg1say4MvcQowQHs5II r0RhabgQb0piZVVqUX58UWlOavEhRmkOFiVxXv2XiuFCAumJJanZqakFqUUwWSYOTqkGxiZG e4lN58/y9fZXcHFyXD1iEP/05JeeoIseMvzT4k64XkxcGH9Tqardg8FtopLezgezZi093u0X M0P7z+crG2Y03bprLMha0rmZc7Ls8k8TJ/rzL/54qsnpoP1Wlcu1Lt8t1pp8f9hxLKjkYmfK c32N62eXNZbs2v0x7KgE/8JV0d+150k+7lRiKc5INNRiLipOBAB3GHVa0gIAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/hQ6eg2UkNfkSQtvh2aU3G2ln6bI>
Cc: "Dave Dolson (ddolson@sandvine.com)" <ddolson@sandvine.com>, Tal Mizrahi <talmi@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] How to better engage SFC?
X-BeenThere: rtg-ooam-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: List is used by the Routing Area Overlay OAM Design team for internal coordination and discussion <rtg-ooam-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-ooam-dt>, <mailto:rtg-ooam-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-ooam-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-ooam-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-ooam-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-ooam-dt>, <mailto:rtg-ooam-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:28:19 -0000

Hi Giuseppe,
thank you for volunteering to help with PM story. It would be great to make it about the marking method in SFC pointing to flexibility of placing the Test Point either at Classifier, SF or SFF. And, as done in PM with the Marking Method in BIER Layer, demonstrate benefit of two-bit long vs. one-bit long field for marking.

As for the listed drafts I have serious concerns that I'll sum and share with the team before our meeting next Tuesday. I'd like to look not into particular solutions described in these drafts but for the problems they are addressing. I think these are real-life problems and we can propose solutions to, solutions based on Common Overlay OAM.

                Regards,
                                Greg

From: Fioccola Giuseppe [mailto:giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 3:06 AM
To: Gregory Mirsky; Erik Nordmark; rtg-ooam-dt@ietf.org; 'Alia Atlas'
Cc: Tal Mizrahi; Dave Dolson (ddolson@sandvine.com)
Subject: R: [Rtg-ooam-dt] How to better engage SFC?

Hi Greg, All
That's for sure! I appreciate your consideration.
The documents you suggested are precious.
In particular, draft-browne-sfc-nsh-timestamp could be considered for the timestamping of NSH packets and be combined to the marking method very well.
The proposed extension to TWAMP to carry services KPI data, proposed in draft-spv-ippm-monitor-implementation-services-kpi, is also suitable for the purpose.
And draft-agv-sfc-performance-measurement-architecture should be the reference for the PM architecture for SFCs

If all of us agree, I could propose some text for the "PM over SFP" Section of the gap analysis document with reference to draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark and documents quoted above.
I could send you proposed text before next Tuesday call.

Best Regards,

Giuseppe

Da: Gregory Mirsky [mailto:gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com]
Inviato: mercoledì 29 giugno 2016 21:53
A: Fioccola Giuseppe; Erik Nordmark; rtg-ooam-dt@ietf.org<mailto:rtg-ooam-dt@ietf.org>; 'Alia Atlas'
Cc: Tal Mizrahi; Dave Dolson (ddolson@sandvine.com<mailto:ddolson@sandvine.com>)
Oggetto: RE: [Rtg-ooam-dt] How to better engage SFC?


Hi Giuseppe,

I think it would be interesting to discuss considering proposals that may be addressed using the marking method:

·         draft-browne-sfc-nsh-timestamp

·         draft-spv-ippm-monitor-implementation-services-kpi

Would you have contribution for the gap analysis document too? That would be absolutely great.



                Regards,

                                Greg



-----Original Message-----
From: Fioccola Giuseppe [mailto:giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 1:57 AM
To: Erik Nordmark; Gregory Mirsky; rtg-ooam-dt@ietf.org<mailto:rtg-ooam-dt@ietf.org>; 'Alia Atlas'
Cc: Tal Mizrahi; Dave Dolson (ddolson@sandvine.com<mailto:ddolson@sandvine.com>)
Subject: R: [Rtg-ooam-dt] How to better engage SFC?



Hi Erik,

Yes It is a very good idea.

If all of us agree, we could detail the marking method application in the SFC scenario, by considering some use cases.



Regards,



Giuseppe



-----Messaggio originale-----

Da: Rtg-ooam-dt [mailto:rtg-ooam-dt-bounces@ietf.org] Per conto di Erik Nordmark

Inviato: martedì 28 giugno 2016 16:41

A: Gregory Mirsky; rtg-ooam-dt@ietf.org<mailto:rtg-ooam-dt@ietf.org>; 'Alia Atlas'

Cc: Tal Mizrahi; Dave Dolson (ddolson@sandvine.com<mailto:ddolson@sandvine.com>)

Oggetto: [Rtg-ooam-dt] How to better engage SFC?



On the OOAM call this morning a question was raised whether we should present anywhere than RTFWG.



I wonder whether having an OOAM presentation in SFC would help to get more interest and contributions from SFC.

(I don't think we need it for BIER and NOV3 since we seem to have sufficient engagement with those WGs.)



Thoughts?

    Erik



_______________________________________________

Rtg-ooam-dt mailing list

Rtg-ooam-dt@ietf.org<mailto:Rtg-ooam-dt@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-ooam-dt



Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.



This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.