Re: [Rtg-open-source] rtg-open-source list and meeting at IETF 98

[Alia Atlas <[e-mail]>]

Hi Charles,

Thanks for the feedback.   The last couple we've just gone around the room
and done introductions.
I'd rather see something more useful/interactive this time as well.  I'm
happy to approve (or request)
a room and assume that Thursday breakfast would be the time, again.

I'd be delighted to see some self-organization on the list around what
would be useful to do or discuss.

I'm happy to attend and listen and think about what can be usefully done
for better integration, but
I don't think that I can personally drive this community or the meetings
and have them be beneficial.

Regards,
Alia

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Hi Alia,
>
>
>
> I think an in person meeting would be useful and will prioritize it in my
> schedule if it occurs.
>
> I found our brief meeting at IETF 97 informative and a good use of time.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Charles
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Rtg-open-source <[e-mail]> on behalf of
> Alia Atlas <[e-mail]>
> *Date: *Friday, February 3, 2017 at 12:49 PM
> *To: *"[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
> *Subject: *[Rtg-open-source] rtg-open-source list and meeting at IETF 98
>
>
>
> There hasn't been substantial discussion or coordination on the
> rtg-opens-source mailing list.  We did meet in person at IETF 97 and there
> was a suggestion for having a more general meeting (non-WG forming BoF type
> thing) that would discuss different open source projects, their maturity,
> and deployed state and use.  The BOF deadline is February 10 and I haven't
> heard of motion on this idea yet.
>
>
>
> Is it useful to consider meeting in person again at IETF 98?  Is it
> sufficient to simply have this mailing list for discussion and coordination
> when necessary?
>
>
>
> Without enthusiasm expressed here, I'm not anticipating having a meeting
> at IETF 98.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Alia
>
>