IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] draft-baker-rtgwg-src-dst-routing-use-cases-00 in the rtgwg today

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 07 November 2013 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5BA11E8188; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:08:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.105, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lqn3VzTOZH1r; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:08:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3::184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9E921E81EB; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:08:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495D920315; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 13:19:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id CFF9963B88; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:08:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB6063AED; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:08:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>, Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] draft-baker-rtgwg-src-dst-routing-use-cases-00 in the rtgwg today
In-Reply-To: <A4365745-1D03-46CD-9C61-4C0A7DB8C289@inf-net.nl>
References: <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE47030C88C1@eusaamb106.ericsson.se> <B6BB0DCD-D913-4E63-B33E-E6C74832FA92@cisco.com> <48E7C224-3A50-42BD-AF02-3F98D17200CA@inf-net.nl> <D5D7A086-FC1A-4835-B437-254BE965C666@townsley.net> <A4365745-1D03-46CD-9C61-4C0A7DB8C289@inf-net.nl>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 12:08:03 -0500
Message-ID: <15319.1383844083@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 10:06:32 -0800
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 17:08:53 -0000

Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl> wrote:
    > For homenets and having ingress filtering as BCP, I think ::/0 routes
    > with ::/0 source prefixes shall not be used. Also, for homenets I do
    > not see a use case for non-::0 destination prefixes with non-::/0
    > source prefixes. 

Access to the LLN in the home might only effectively work if you use the
(right?) ULA.    

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email