[rtgwg] Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-rtgwg-llmmoe-multicast-01.txt
zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn Mon, 27 October 2025 08:12 UTC
Return-Path: <zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtgwg@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950AD7CB8FDA; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 01:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.195
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.195 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lCzviHIu6G5u; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 01:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (mxct.zte.com.cn [183.62.165.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 106F87CB8FD3; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 01:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mxct.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4cw5nZ5JQ4z4xQXJ; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:11:46 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njy2app03.zte.com.cn ([10.40.13.14]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 59R8B2m8059964; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:11:21 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njb2app06[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:11:23 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:11:23 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afe68ff292bd07-07184
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <20251027161123871fCAw0f06nvAvDSep567WW@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <CAJZB_o6tWfEkgpG9GAsMCphzmEHb66o1KXoR3=bxerV23p4opQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 20251022094055808ZmZqKL2X0V8i_bDyNlGlb@zte.com.cn,CAJZB_o6tWfEkgpG9GAsMCphzmEHb66o1KXoR3=bxerV23p4opQ@mail.gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn
To: troy@troys.network
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 59R8B2m8059964
X-TLS: YES
X-SPF-DOMAIN: zte.com.cn
X-ENVELOPE-SENDER: zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn
X-SPF: None
X-SOURCE-IP: 10.5.228.132 unknown Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:11:46 +0800
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 68FF2942.001/4cw5nZ5JQ4z4xQXJ
Message-ID-Hash: NENEVMFMDX5WX2LC42UG32VGQ2E3FZC2
X-Message-ID-Hash: NENEVMFMDX5WX2LC42UG32VGQ2E3FZC2
X-MailFrom: zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-rtgwg.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: rtgwg@ietf.org, mcast4ai@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [rtgwg] Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-rtgwg-llmmoe-multicast-01.txt
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/4SWxdz-pWbKxN-4dkRO59qvKz9A>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rtgwg-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rtgwg-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rtgwg-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Troy, In my opinion, it should have an impact. Transport layer protocols can use multicast technology as the carrier of the network layer. For IB, etc., corresponding adaptation is also required. Thanks, Sandy Original From: DiegoTroyLopez <troy@troys.network> To: 张征00007940; Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org <rtgwg@ietf.org>;mcast4ai@ietf.org <mcast4ai@ietf.org>; Date: 2025年10月24日 21:26 Subject: Re: [rtgwg] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-rtgwg-llmmoe-multicast-01.txt Hi, What are the implications of this multicast proposal with RDMA transports like infiniband / UE / RoCE? Thanks --- Troy On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 6:41 PM <zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn> wrote: Hi, The draft LLM MoE multicast use case proposed at the last IETF side meeting has been updated based on the feedback received. Welcome more reviews and comments. Thank you! Best regards, Sandy Original From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org> To: 段威10036319;Xiaohu Xu <xuxiaohu_ietf@hotmail.com>;张征00007940; Date: 2025年10月20日 15:22 Subject: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-rtgwg-llmmoe-multicast-01.txt A new version of Internet-Draft draft-zhang-rtgwg-llmmoe-multicast-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Zheng Zhang and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-zhang-rtgwg-llmmoe-multicast Revision: 01 Title: Multicast usage in LLM MoE Date: 2025-10-20 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 7 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-zhang-rtgwg-llmmoe-multicast-01.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-rtgwg-llmmoe-multicast/ HTML: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-zhang-rtgwg-llmmoe-multicast-01.html HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zhang-rtgwg-llmmoe-multicast Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-zhang-rtgwg-llmmoe-multicast-01 Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely used in recent years. The Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture is one of the features of LLMs that enables efficient inference and cost-effective training. With the MoE architecture, there are potential multicast use cases such as tokens dispatching. This draft attempts to analyze these use cases. The IETF Secretariat _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list -- rtgwg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to rtgwg-leave@ietf.org
- [rtgwg] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-zh… zhang.zheng
- [rtgwg] Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Diego Troy Lopez
- [rtgwg] Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draf… zhang.zheng