A query on RIPv2

Bharat Joshi <bharat_joshi@infosys.com> Tue, 25 December 2012 10:31 UTC

Return-Path: <bharat_joshi@infosys.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE3A21F86BE for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 02:31:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LSuf84HiivOq for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 02:31:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kecgate02.infosys.com (kecgate02.infosys.com [122.98.14.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DC721F86B4 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 02:31:51 -0800 (PST)
X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <3101145800078374@infosys.com>
Received: from blrkechub04.ad.infosys.com ([10.66.236.44]) by infosys.com ([122.98.14.32]) with ESMTP (TREND IMSS SMTP Service 7.1) id 3101145800078374 ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 15:57:14 +0530
Received: from BLRKECHUB07.ad.infosys.com (10.66.236.117) by blrkechub04.ad.infosys.com (10.66.236.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 16:01:49 +0530
Received: from BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com ([fe80::c43d:ba67:abc0:11c3]) by BLRKECHUB07.ad.infosys.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 16:01:48 +0530
From: Bharat Joshi <bharat_joshi@infosys.com>
To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: A query on RIPv2
Thread-Topic: A query on RIPv2
Thread-Index: Ac3iiwsWsu05KlXPT+O3nDXOBUFIIQ==
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:31:47 +0000
Message-ID: <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED2B643823@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-IN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.200.132]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:16:41 -0800
Cc: Bharat Joshi <bharat_joshi@infosys.com>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:31:55 -0000

Hi All,

     I came across some text in RFC 2453 (RIPv2) which has confused me. It would be great if someone can clarify this for me. I searched the net and looked through the errata but could not find any reference to this.

In section 3.9.1 of RFC 2453 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2453#section-3.9.1), in second para, following text is available:

<quote>

   There is one special case.  If there is exactly
   one entry in the request, and it has an address family identifier of
   zero and a metric of infinity (i.e., 16), then this is a request to
   send the entire routing table.

<unquote>

In section 4.1 of same RFC (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2453#section-4.1), in first para, following text is available:

<quote>

   If the Address Family Identifier of the first (and
   only the first) entry in the message is 0xFFFF, then the remainder of
   the entry contains the authentication.

<unquote>

    Now what has confused me is that if a router is configured to use authentication, how should its 'request' message for full routing table look? Should it go without authentication information or with authentication information?

    If it goes with authentication information then it is not conforming to the statement of 3.9.1. If it goes without authentication information then it is not conforming to the user configuration and also there may be security issues.

Regards,
Bharat

PS: I am currently not subscribed to RTG working group mailing list, so please reply all so that I can get your reply.


**************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely 
for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please 
notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not 
to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and 
any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken 
every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage 
you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your 
own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the 
right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail 
address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the 
Infosys e-mail system.
***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***