Re: Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-07: (with DISCUSS)

[Kathleen Moriarty <[e-mail]>]

Thank you, Xufeng.  This looks much better and I've cleared.

Best regards,
Kathleen

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Xufeng Liu <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Hi Kathleen,
>
> Thanks for pointing out the latest security template. We have updated the document with the new security template, and submitted a new version https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08. Please check if it is ok.
>
> Regards,
> - Xufeng
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:[e-mail]]
>> Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 4:25 PM
>> To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
>> Cc: [e-mail]; Yingzhen Qu
>> <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
>> [e-mail]
>> Subject: Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-07: (with
>> DISCUSS)
>>
>> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-07: Discuss
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
>> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
>> paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> DISCUSS:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Thanks for your work on this draft.  The current template for the security
>> consideration section was not used, could you please update the draft?  I believe
>> this is the current working version:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-10#page-52
>>
>> If there is a reason for not elaborating on data nodes per the template (too
>> many rw, etc.) a summary would be helpful.
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen