Re: Working Group last call on draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability - IPR

[Pushpasis Sarkar <[e-mail]>]

Hi Jeff/Alvar

Please note that Juniper has just disclosed IPR on this document. I am not
aware of any further IPR on this document.

Note that Juniper disclosed the same IPR against
draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-01 on 2/24/14 and on further
reflection consider that a disclosure against this draft may also be
applicable.


Thanks
-Pushpasis


>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: rtgwg [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura
>Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 21:54
>To: [e-mail]
>Subject: Working Group last call on draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability -
>IPR
>
>All,
>
>In parallel to the WGLC for this draft, I want to formally ask the
>authors (no additional contributors are listed in the latest version of
>the draft) to please respond to this message indicating whether or not
>you are aware of any relevant IPR.  The draft will not progress (pending
>the results of the WGLC) until we have received a response from each
>author.
>
>
>In addition, we wanted to take this opportunity to remind the entire WG
>that the duty of disclosure is NOT limited to authors:
>
>   (c) in order for the working group and the rest of the IETF to have
>       the information needed to make an informed decision about the use
>       of a particular technology, all those contributing to the working
>       group's discussions must disclose the existence of any IPR the
>       Contributor or other IETF participant believes Covers or may
>       ultimately Cover the technology under discussion.  This applies
>       to both Contributors and other participants, and applies whether
>       they contribute in person, via email or by other means.  The
>       requirement applies to all IPR of the participant, the
>       participant's employer, sponsor, or others represented by the
>       participants, that is reasonably and personally known to the
>       participant.  No patent search is required.
>
>RFC 3979 also points out disclosure must be "as soon as reasonably
>possible":
>
>   The IPR disclosure required pursuant to section 6.1.1 must be made as
>   soon as reasonably possible after the Contribution is published in an
>   Internet Draft unless the required disclosure is already on file.
>
>Thank you!
>
>
>
>Cheers,
>Jeff
>
>_______________________________________________
>rtgwg mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
>_______________________________________________
>
>Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
>confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
>recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
>electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme
>ou falsifie. Merci.
>
>This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
>information that may be protected by law;
>they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
>delete this message and its attachments.
>As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have
>been modified, changed or falsified.
>Thank you.
>
>