IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Numbering Exchange Protocol (NEP) ID.

Luis Balbinot <luis@luisbalbinot.com> Mon, 11 December 2017 00:18 UTC

Return-Path: <luis@luisbalbinot.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B436126DCA for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:18:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=luisbalbinot-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dYDMV8KZm8LT for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:18:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x233.google.com (mail-pf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9873E124207 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:18:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id j124so10264494pfc.2 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:18:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=luisbalbinot-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=idmTm4sxKPSW2/nPJVmx0XOmTDd0qCW+xikAj6dHyJA=; b=JnhruHQlNaBZysUjtOjbXtuWBAKbJ5BkIxTAXGMT0iKruWIvRTOyYpPCkCnbjwiR2i tWplMvqtLZrPrdD4GLJO+wrbsX511b3kbmynjplmIGTt1H07qDsqL2YdXz48SZONCEzi PktRAWx6PjFhs4HwWdmrP9DkPOOLwLu7GqgAiWB80eQNSR+YBKTTf/AsBH/h+Wh/zzNK l4boY9APi8ifS18AxwYmFcZomalApFPKGsXgJrLUpd2kY2nSGC+RRpau7Tb5mmXp/7Dc WuMFcmdOVy9GA8Vul+Yi50L3L9M7jVgAGIgZYCLuxTw0As3Qww0B12P7Sp9MjQCAj1+f Qprw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=idmTm4sxKPSW2/nPJVmx0XOmTDd0qCW+xikAj6dHyJA=; b=efV1L6x7PuNGx9YudMuDeZy0EIUYbCrvqI1c0d1gtBcIkzRNP4pIZ6EAEAXmJlfaG1 2N2hxcEe37QG96ebbCtOQXHyzppnjHIRhNj9hDZrXFlTWmeH0ZGPBGVmcGBaGGH/eF3h q18Am33odrj+09p8TIKx/EJh1V9RREcYrOx6jIwCgrRCUVvPtIC/vDqk559auE57sX1r UqDjJpAqf3+35ovzSNZ6F/j2i1GcvCgLy2yUBYerV68Q7Ss6v/Rx7aK2hxUcHJ1BK/1V cqYKHnqSxlhUR3Va36FRrmQkpeVlK1UlUBnpKze5rrcPNaRJ96d/xj3W10zAYwslBiLG 1Ocg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJ5gPEVviYOW6G4u+24tjhvXPwSgKt7q2TLotzV6+POu5iDGJqy 2T3d+DoEpHhrKfize7wfSDFZtxa8miXLliHwRAye
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBot961yWMSLNwtGt+02mIb0q09yT95I8STa0cAtNrwr9WWjg5BahZ2U98SdXTFGQYzTuF2QggrLCd6ZzsEF661M=
X-Received: by 10.159.235.132 with SMTP id f4mr5941337plr.122.1512951480185; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:18:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.241.195 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:17:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.241.195 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:17:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AM4PR0401MB224147F429B83CBD7A91FA0FBD300@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <AM4PR0401MB224147F429B83CBD7A91FA0FBD300@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
From: Luis Balbinot <luis@luisbalbinot.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:17:59 -0200
Message-ID: <CAFsaiiNV67Y82krAbfj4F4ZuNKXcU9gCMJUmdHkqt8hOa0QqHA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Numbering Exchange Protocol (NEP) ID.
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
Cc: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1dffe08a0674056005774b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/Aqe89Ca6VcySHLg5A5PLUuH3SO0>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:18:05 -0000

Yeah, these are not the people you are looking for. Talk to operators, they
will let you know how IGP metrics are useless in today's networks, even the
enhanced metrics you are proposing.

You must take into consideration that almost all traffic engineering on
large networks is actually done using other protocols, even with external
controllers nowadays. These external controllers have much more knowledge
about the network and running applications than the network nodes do. IGP
metrics are informational at best.

Luis

On Dec 8, 2017 14:02, "Khaled Omar" <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> Below is one of the IDs that I uploaded to the IETF and looking for
> discussing it with the appropriate people and the appropriate area of
> discussion.
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-nep/
>
>
>
> I tried to make it not so long so it can be read quickly and still clear
> for everyone.
>
>
>
> *Regards,*
>
>
>
> *Khaled Omar*
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email