Re: Request for WG adoption of draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-04

Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 12 July 2016 05:29 UTC

Return-Path: <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C3B12B075; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 22:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZRXpHIv5io7O; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 22:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x229.google.com (mail-pf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 874C412B04B; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 22:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id h14so2859661pfe.1; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 22:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=efYfBWIlH5hXTyqcwF7vCe7EhUXs4gqHlQOy5IILcoo=; b=MOLJX+Vs+PLgKsm/h6vWkbJZZw7pH4vhix93Gmd1mhiTxrGWRt1K5QmvYRWK+Acamo 0kfn7WTHDygUy9E3pPPqoI06HMjb62QqmkODze4tXa5IMNi8KpsHr/5PbkLF3ph6bi5G C9q8c/GDt0k8XhSogBSotWgzE86BghCsiW2VV1vohWzNURZVQQUqIivoKTKfvsCf9tZF olzKoBahGDs2jL93h3NbkY7cVJj0N2RO1EK7KpEduoVSxT+WZd14YEXK6wUCfzXcXdiZ IAYjPw3WMxhk6h5vcdlfNamiOj6+TaNM+z1pJqTMPX2rw/lqii6CEd/sJI0CJPVrR4sq mgxg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=efYfBWIlH5hXTyqcwF7vCe7EhUXs4gqHlQOy5IILcoo=; b=RYC7h1rw3Ti9wm8b85FAVp91hUHDJpmFG8+eJbXCTuePojsn+JubqzScxh7o0czR9w bZiUEZZKPlJbmPYIzPJCU9Y6e5VnG4IHD+uAIUKQ/4A7/GaneoN5B7pskZawQg6nr9UF dJN1+4XmlE93lmB4ncdPM8CIBgCdHVhFT2fM9jcM4gj1t8yoJLolU2J+kjl1k5/oE7nW CXueU+zCIxQ/I0C3m3iBlMyvkS1VaB8qvbs9hsEnCG7JfmYOuS3Qp+foSKyWik/YMT5F 4L+J8OxLfCt8oPH98lPJjYF4KHDtqz0+KZLemduKXOqPvC0MHJB3WGxIW9JYjljLOfmZ XoGw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI1nWU2HmB265FakznAi663tAQqXDnFHYqrcEiyf7ak6cykxV6EaKtST56Ejp6HGA==
X-Received: by 10.98.84.197 with SMTP id i188mr41395902pfb.43.1468301376084; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 22:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.78] ([122.171.156.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f10sm504098pfc.79.2016.07.11.22.29.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 22:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Request for WG adoption of draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-04
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <F17553F7-A619-439B-A3A5-95E034626C59@gmail.com> <CAEFuwkiq7q1pPVEqAZkS0CSGUU-jKPy=qzUixRa-SdvX8XQZHQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5784803C.1070902@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:59:32 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEFuwkiq7q1pPVEqAZkS0CSGUU-jKPy=qzUixRa-SdvX8XQZHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050902060503030701060001"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/CB2Zeq90Ob2MsJlQ34McVmYK-9s>
Cc: "draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa@ietf.org" <draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 05:29:38 -0000

Hi Jeff,

Also I am not aware of any IPR other than the ones already disclosed.

Thanks and Regards,
-Pushpasis

On Tuesday 12 July 2016 10:51 AM, Pushpasis Sarkar wrote:
> Support as author. This draft serves a great guideline for any 
> developer implementing LFA protection for multi-homed prefixes.
>
> Best Regards,
> Pushpasis
>
> On Tuesday, 12 July 2016, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com 
> <mailto:jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Dear RTGWG,
>
>     The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt
>     draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-04 as the working group
>     document.
>
>     This draft has been present multiple times and no further comments
>     are to be addressed at this moment.
>
>     Please indicate support or no-support by July 30,, 2016.
>
>     If you are listed as a document author or contributor please
>     respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of
>     any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG
>     mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage
>     until a response has been received from each author and each
>     individual that has contributed to the document.
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Jeff & Chris
>