Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-08.txt

Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 17 November 2016 10:28 UTC

Return-Path: <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CD71294D4 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 02:28:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2KVt48Jx-G58 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 02:28:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb0-x22b.google.com (mail-yb0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08FA1129662 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 02:28:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id d59so50211435ybi.1 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 02:28:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UEiWMOJ48mAPiAJrZjqoyxY5nFgeUUwdFGe+Xu+HjEI=; b=sZarK3WuZcA82gjoKkA7fB7EVk9x44+7Ong1cprxVUzIz9pHl9dkd7FF6R+rtqzBlA OgYyIi4TZHccMdbILb9obp1IERb+OPhr4z7y1eL5whwalMHlmNUbismiMgn6bYo1M/7b wjenxMSFMA9MRx38O7zD0Hw7bH624STCQu30nIWV+vDxFw9BkAyhbWOjtSnmlEe0q+eF xCFWfRqQ6HeviI2Ejfm90zp0a5pMTiW7WyJt+ZLP3olMq44NKCdk4L33L3bsU7HdMZdD JD8vQs0Lvi0xd9doFo3Y2z3atbGiVsX3jDzXmiqqpYIo4qWuwdwhEHZq/kEFS1ks07dk EBpA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=UEiWMOJ48mAPiAJrZjqoyxY5nFgeUUwdFGe+Xu+HjEI=; b=HKZHES6zrqQ0wH1NjDT23oXphfjEokoFqwSefQk8aCvGW5LagNzgcio1/ZAaUpDAF1 W2I19vQpXwAf5FKQqX6b48MFOnTF1bPS+gbhslI6WwwxUQzqVqw8hZbBvydWWwiMZY6l J48BhWxjOtyY0XCUJtDA8FfM8jfwZTZs73ZSclUa7JrrTSbWc+vM7PqkqRCB4zBIjs9p rfHAX3HCL8hTzUZyFRTaDMsqG5GF8C158c29XUCZDpRhqDK4ix7YMZtDR/F/62rXxoxe JBH42T4YD+hAvmgONaODGghu35R38N1Or1NW+RvVSTQPcK9Gv9QAB5GKua4ByLbgFy6W HUPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01XOcij3DbcXXqXrwet5RaN/p6PzRcncwuievRuZH2CblQZwUdzt98A1U+NuFlNMYFVHt2zlQYoP52xlg==
X-Received: by 10.37.83.134 with SMTP id h128mr1347595ybb.122.1479378518050; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 02:28:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.207.2 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 02:28:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <147937840183.1638.952378536082844556.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <147937840183.1638.952378536082844556.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:58:37 +0530
Message-ID: <CAEFuwkje1vx5eZMncaQnN-G-oF=Bqdek3tO5tkJEv6jBJwj8xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-08.txt
To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113e5d100e8e1f05417ca775"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/CF98aj1C5-wLfOeRsmYxvUtjpro>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:28:41 -0000

Hi All,

This version addresses the review comments from the document shepherd.

Thanks and Regards,
-Pushpasis

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 3:56 PM
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-08.txt
To: Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>, Shraddha Hegde <
shraddha@juniper.net>, Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net>, Hannes Gredler <
hannes@rtbrick.com>, Stephane Litkowski <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>



A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-08.txt
has been successfully submitted by Pushpasis Sarkar and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection
Revision:       08
Title:          Remote-LFA Node Protection and Manageability
Document date:  2016-11-17
Group:          rtgwg
Pages:          17
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-
node-protection-08.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-
node-protection/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-
protection-08
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-
node-protection-08

Abstract:
   The loop-free alternates computed following the current Remote-LFA
   specification guarantees only link-protection.  The resulting Remote-
   LFA nexthops (also called PQ-nodes), may not guarantee node-
   protection for all destinations being protected by it.

   This document describes an extension to the Remote Loop-Free based IP
   fast reroute mechanisms described in [RFC7490], that describes
   procedures for determining if a given PQ-node provides node-
   protection for a specific destination or not.  The document also
   shows how the same procedure can be utilised for collection of
   complete characteristics for alternate paths.  Knowledge about the
   characteristics of all alternate path is precursory to apply operator
   defined policy for eliminating paths not fitting constraints.





Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat