draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework-02 - please comment
Curtis Villamizar <curtis@occnc.com> Fri, 19 October 2012 19:12 UTC
Return-Path: <curtis@occnc.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C2221F87A3 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.409
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.409 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.191, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vKGlQbXaQ4xA for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway1.orleans.occnc.com (gateway1.orleans.occnc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1545::1:132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C573B21F878C for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harbor1.ipv6.occnc.com (harbor1.ipv6.occnc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1545::2:819]) (authenticated bits=0) by gateway1.orleans.occnc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9JJCI0H038298; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:12:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from curtis@occnc.com)
Message-Id: <201210191912.q9JJCI0H038298@gateway1.orleans.occnc.com>
To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework-02 - please comment
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@occnc.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:12:18 -0400
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: curtis@occnc.com
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:12:22 -0000
RTGWG, An update to draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework-02 has just been submitted. Please read this document and comment prior to the WG meeting. I've requested a long time slot so we can get into any technical issues with the document. Significant changes are: 1. New "1.5 Document Issues" subsection (part of "Introduction"). The purpose of this section is to focus co-author and WG discussion on things in the document that are known to need attention. Please read and comment on this. It wouldn't hurt to read the whole document, but at least read this 1.5 pages. 2. Entropy label is featured more prominently as *the solution* to carrying LSP with strict packet ordering, particularly when carrying such LSP within other larger LSP. Changes to referenced drafts: 1. draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-label completed the IETF process and is now in the editor's queue. 2. draft-villamizar-mpls-tp-multipath has been simplified down from 35 pages to 9 pages and essentially just proposes to use ELI and EL to support MPLS-TP LSP over MPLS LSP as a client layer. Extensive discussion of multipath and TP requirements are removed. Alternates other than EL are removed. Suggestions that another method of limiting label stack depeth based on LSP lookup is removed, therefore the one Infinera IPR can be removed. 3. a lot of drafts referenced by CL framework are expired and only partially meet the set of requirements defined in CL requirements in the area they address. For example, if there really is interest in meeting the delay requirements, then the delay metric draft needs to be picked up, dusted off, checked agains CL requirements, edited as needed, and resubmited. A list of drafts that have expired is in "Document Issues" subsection. See you in Atlanta. Regardless of whether you are going, please comment on the WG mailing list. Thanks, Curtis ------- Forwarded Message From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework-02.txt Message-ID: <20121019185506.13244.5932.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:55:06 -0700 Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. Title : Composite Link Framework in Multi Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Author(s) : So Ning Dave McDysan Eric Osborne Lucy Yong Curtis Villamizar Filename : draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework-02.txt Pages : 43 Date : 2012-10-19 Abstract: This document specifies a framework for support of composite link in MPLS networks. A composite link consists of a group of homogenous or non-homogenous links that have the same forward adjacency and can be considered as a single TE link or an IP link in routing. A composite link relies on its component links to carry the traffic over the composite link. Applicability is described for a single pair of MPLS-capable nodes, a sequence of MPLS-capable nodes, or a set of layer networks connecting MPLS-capable nodes. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework-02 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg ------- End of Forwarded Message
- draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework-02 - please comment Curtis Villamizar