Request to be removed from the list of co-authors
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 15 May 2019 16:01 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B0D1202FA; Wed, 15 May 2019 09:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z7qDzpr_w6NL; Wed, 15 May 2019 09:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C557120318; Wed, 15 May 2019 09:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id v18so264967lfi.1; Wed, 15 May 2019 09:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WfJ48VXcW365hBB9+ft/siLwfS9FNfOrln0ize1VEmk=; b=SD0AsIIZjCa0Gs9AhvB4TXOS9Q5Om2imcKcmOY0vCKZ2kOtX3VOLLfzrpn/5Qo7RKR 5Dcf1IV+tVpJ5ALVpneQPBo8maithMdkmsPnQ+3QW08AiIDKnExNsgabSMJc1LpSQmDo byriJkkwzGZ/3WbsOMFfO/FSbW2NAkk8N9XaKiNgVpyZ5XCxuTSTH+SpUTszk7yYGA0N Vlr8DepBrVCDVHvA7mr6TcRCk5k8yzuF60MIlGmsB49TXbzOQjrlVP/8NBYKNrXoiQ5E 2+gu10BZIbhERsew6tJvrzehsgRN7yxktGYnl9Vx13yTgihPhx5c40uSSrvsbiZM6uR6 td7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WfJ48VXcW365hBB9+ft/siLwfS9FNfOrln0ize1VEmk=; b=nlO65JhCgEZc6O3oUbXg6QejPG1q4CBRSDOd1xEzofI6vH8ITDIKKqLsoE1vIBsl98 Tkzh/KSWPCv1wV3X0/D1f3vpr1Q5y+3rKSYRukTYpRMF9EYv3IWE9qcOfpwu7tsiQlyK GEPM/DT6qPLWRwajaJblowa49hCxSSJunCCuZHHabwbLbg8Ht/NU7oKNW+HPTCBgKz0n TCqEOfiUv61URjB9stPDgILtjeI1vG8Kwa5MDOoLXOp+z7asHGVaTHSOrjpWR7eEfwhb fM33dH0hAXith7ZOgyMQhUuvMF4R+2ysdFi+1hU0fGQvT2SNZDH/mU3EyZxdXd9lLuKx QGGw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVTui+yrg4soNDidrdYzPuN7Dw5q8X9SaS7En04aZNNds1v6WFZ j8SCF0jF/eRkXXFkHDp5JyneHrK4dIBl+V7STkt45hlY
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyB+UBGSX8CqYk3QEOZWXJV0m6hKk3uhp0iYrFho0X3lIlcwdxZCLlzoLYw6MPoHswBaGAbjdKie+5tz9oQr0c=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:52a8:: with SMTP id r8mr20141832lfm.20.1557936096025; Wed, 15 May 2019 09:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 09:01:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVw4JgtFR3Kg2H2upwpZzbTsbKboGq0yXGovjpaSAEVgA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Request to be removed from the list of co-authors
To: draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-bfd-p2p@ietf.org, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000961ed20588ef4332"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/Cww13bj3mjKIQNJvQahauAjPVnY>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 16:01:56 -0000
Dear Authors, WG Chairs, et al., my request may sound unusual at first so I'll try to explain how and why I've decided to do it. Firstly, after the part that defines the use of p2mp BFD (now RFC 8562) was removed because of IPR concerns, there's no substantive contribution of mine in the document. Secondly, I believe that the use of RFC 8562 to support sub-second convergence in VRRP is simpler, easier to deploy than the one based on RFC 5880 And lastly, the draft expired and had not been progressed in quite some time. In case RTGWG WG will be interested in developing the solution based on RFC 8562 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case/>, authors are ready and committed to working on it. Regards, Greg
- Request to be removed from the list of co-authors Greg Mirsky
- Re: Request to be removed from the list of co-aut… Chris Bowers