RE: WG docs reminder

"Don Fedyk" <dwfedyk@nortel.com> Fri, 17 November 2006 17:50 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gl7rW-0000T2-Vi; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:50:50 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gl7rV-0000St-P2 for rtgwg@ietf.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:50:49 -0500
Received: from zrtps0kp.nortel.com ([47.140.192.56]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gl7rA-0002Dj-TL for rtgwg@ietf.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:50:49 -0500
Received: from zrtphxm2.corp.nortel.com (zrtphxm2.corp.nortel.com [47.140.202.51]) by zrtps0kp.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id kAHHoJS25690; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:50:19 -0500 (EST)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:50:15 -0500
Message-ID: <34B3EAA5B3066A42914D28C5ECF5FEA40BF4B92D@zrtphxm2.corp.nortel.com>
In-Reply-To: <p0623090bc1823a37fa83@[10.0.1.2]>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: WG docs reminder
Thread-Index: AccJmEhAi5u0lNNISPmbgf9tEF29VwA176Wg
From: Don Fedyk <dwfedyk@nortel.com>
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@cisco.com>, rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228
Cc:
Subject: RE: WG docs reminder
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: rtgwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org

Hi John

I've started reviewing this. Are these documents intended as Standard or
Informational? 
The Loop free documents is informational from my reading of the minutes.


Thanks,
Don  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John G. Scudder [mailto:jgs@cisco.com] 
> 
> As a reminder, three documents were proposed as WG documents at our
> IETF-67 meeting:
> 
> draft-bryant-shand-lf-conv-frmwk-03.txt
> draft-bryant-shand-ipfrr-notvia-addresses-03.txt
> draft-francois-ordered-fib-02.txt
> 
> Rough consensus at the in-person meeting favored adoption.  
> The deadline for comments to the list is November 21 (this 
> coming Tuesday).
> 
> --John
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
> 

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg