IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo-07

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 01 February 2018 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBDE126B7E; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 13:31:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.529
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.529 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MIqArzXeqPDZ; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 13:31:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 402F7124C27; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 13:31:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8772; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1517520661; x=1518730261; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=13eQKuTLoyyaula+VVhMTYulCvCVmfxbqkvQhrg9SYM=; b=XobShDbZn0Vnle9nkM59cfb2AnG6eItKFOF1y4uYXQy2BnUdb9lLADt3 KZ9baCQIJ9+ZfNE5qVdYYRQIFF5x8NSFHEz/VMbKAOavYB0IYLkd52xRh Qb1iBIJKAVxcx0ZYHe2Iwq0GqH+FVsfxALMc2+f9LbstFjTr1tHr+GHMC 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DtAQBBhnNa/5BdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJKeGZ1KAqDVphSggKJE4hghVWCFwqFOwIaghdWFgEBAQEBAQEBAmsohSMBAQEEI2YCAQgOAwMBAisCAgIfER0IAgQBEhuJNkwDFaxlgieHNg2DIgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2EaYIVg2iDBYJrRASCD4J3MYI0BYtul3c+ApBmhQaUMY4wiQ4CERkBgTsBJQEygVBwFWcBgX8JhG54iyWBFwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,444,1511827200"; d="scan'208,217";a="340382127"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2018 21:31:00 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w11LUxoT013648 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 1 Feb 2018 21:31:00 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:30:58 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:30:58 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo-07
Thread-Topic: AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo-07
Thread-Index: AQHTmq0uMUcwUAAjDkCJ8Vjb8rqW0KOQEosA
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 21:30:58 +0000
Message-ID: <4B8C9208-DD87-4EE5-B701-266E53C7D5CB@cisco.com>
References: <CAG4d1rd18NjszhDs9pjyO_=GnDwyDBa106mrNBT3vyZ7=M7b-w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rd18NjszhDs9pjyO_=GnDwyDBa106mrNBT3vyZ7=M7b-w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4B8C9208DD874EE5B701266E53C7D5CBciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/FGO4Sgyck1D2rW9hTzGRkPAXzBs>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 21:31:04 -0000

Thanks much for the review Alia,
Acee

From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:04 AM
To: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo@ietf.org>
Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo-07
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>
Resent-To: Bruno Decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, Stephane Litkowski <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>, <hannes@rtbrick.com>, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, Pierre François <pfrpfr@gmail.com>, Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net>
Resent-Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:04 AM

As is customary, I have done my AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo-07. First, I would like to thank the authors - Bruno, Stephane, Hannes, Acee, Pierre, and Chris - as well as those who have reviewed, commented on, and implemented this draft.  It is particularly excellent to see this straightforward solution already implemented and have seen the clear analyses of how it helps.

I do see that there are 6 authors; as you all well know, the normal maximum is 5.  Given that I have seen the active inputs and that there are several implementations, I am not pushing to reduce that number now.

I have requested an IETF Last Call and placed this on the telechat on Feb 8.

Regards,
Alia

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email