IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Persistent loops when mixing rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming and rtgwg-dst-src-routing

Matthieu Boutier <boutier@irif.fr> Thu, 27 July 2017 09:07 UTC

Return-Path: <boutier@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DEA126BF3 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 02:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bhCjcm-SUjJ6 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 02:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 027C91200FC for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 02:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from potemkin.univ-paris7.fr (potemkin.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:1]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/56228) with ESMTP id v6R96uVK018377 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:06:56 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by potemkin.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay2/56228) with ESMTP id v6R96uvK032503; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:06:56 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095A9EB343; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:06:56 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id kBk9zcWArB_Z; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:06:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from host-37-32.sg.lan (unknown [172.23.37.32]) (Authenticated sender: boutier) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADE4FEB344; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:06:54 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: Persistent loops when mixing rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming and rtgwg-dst-src-routing
From: Matthieu Boutier <boutier@irif.fr>
In-Reply-To: <D59E78D6.BA292%acee@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:06:54 +0200
Cc: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, Anton Smirnov <as@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E2F46315-BB0F-4463-B7D1-11E0965E92B8@irif.fr>
References: <20170719172913.GU773745@eidolon> <D59D5469.BA187%acee@cisco.com> <BFA9B79E-65F1-4679-BBED-A1FF80CC2050@irif.fr> <D59E78D6.BA292%acee@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]); Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:06:56 +0200 (CEST)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (potemkin.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.141]); Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:06:56 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5979AD30.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-Miltered: at potemkin with ID 5979AD30.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5979AD30.002 from potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/null/potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/<boutier@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5979AD30.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<boutier@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5979AD30.002 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5979AD30.000 on potemkin.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/FixY454hZqkm-DElKLq07sLe1L4>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 09:07:04 -0000

> I believe the tables could be similarly collapsed giving source address
> higher precedence than destination address. Do you disagree?

mmm, it seems I failed to explain something since that's not the point…
Did you agree that:

  1. destination first give the correct behaviour as-is.

  2. source first needs extra mechanism and route duplication.

So we can do it, but we don't *want* so!  I was pointing out that it's
also what is behind this draft, even if not explicitly said.

I'm probably missing something: why would you like "the FIB organization
described in section 3"?

Matthieu

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email