Re: WG adoption call for draft-bowbakova-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming

We published an updated version as a WG document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming/

We went ahead changed the status to informational and added text in
sections 4.2.2 and 4.2.3 to clarify things regarding things that we think
would need to be standardized elsewhere or not, as suggested by Acee.

Please see the diff for the exact text:
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming-00.txt

Please tell us if this text addresses the concern or not.

There were a few other clarifications that we had accumulated in the text
that we went ahead and published with this version as well.  I I don't
think they are controversial, but please check the diff, and they are
certainly open to discussion.

Chris

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear RTGWG,
>
>
>
> The poll has ended and there has been sufficient support to adopt the
>
> draft as the working group document.
>
>
>
> Authors, please republish as the working group document.
>
>
>
> Please update the draft to address Acee’s comment in the next revision.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeff
>
> *From: *rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Jeff Tantsura <
> jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 6:19 PM
> *To: *Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
> *Cc: *"draft-bowbakova-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming@ietf.org" <
> draft-bowbakova-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <
> rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *WG adoption call for draft-bowbakova-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming
>
>
>
>
> Dear RTGWG,
>
>
>
> The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt draft-bowbakova-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming
> draft as the working group document.
>
> RTGWG chairs have discussed the progress of the draft with v6ops chairs
> and got their blessing.
>
> Please indicate support or no-support by March 8th, 2017.
>
> IPR:
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to
> this email.
>
> of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to
> be sent to the RTGWG mailing list.
>
> The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and each
>
> individual that has contributed to the document.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeff & Chris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>
>