IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RE: solicit feedback for adding Interconnection among different Cloud DCs to draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-03

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Thu, 24 October 2019 13:17 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F8812081B; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 06:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KDFe5AzGBlCO; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 06:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5459120123; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 06:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id 71so19480551qkl.0; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 06:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gUnq6lq/eVL2UcvUt7dSOMvHGeHoEYWnrSUhrSngO5M=; b=RV6+ukEgGHobgwEzHoy8UOu6xEfE+nozoPZKLiOvA1iBliH93u5kE+3IKS1rUWfHlo j6rw5ikWDyqQgl9saMbesiekCWWXeNKU+NLZ7790kjwGDQsge/I+cbwE7NkVOQjvg2II ABeWqsa7v70fVarOb9F7V6rPQRGRgL9tOFSnl/OIR4io9AKGU5EDZK5B1e67KG/vKu24 xEIk5Vi4RL8BfK1CuJo3a1efQZDQt+SwhuiqbHXcJKgwYisT9LkXo59++cUP/gmpVqLg mGPCqF5dr+IDbp4QVR7Kkc8d4eade3wqXj4Bb5ox/Hjafvi7h1JDPPFPnenjOpLvOLZr /+BQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gUnq6lq/eVL2UcvUt7dSOMvHGeHoEYWnrSUhrSngO5M=; b=S4bI/iKwoBad7rpwD0yw4/koQLv+hHNX8Ul8L/FmoaPzNP8O5n3eT38LbuBNBhkpj1 /OTDtNJDdTHX402h0B4LFePMSSEc+bFrBZAb4QoAAR4G79ByDc3QkM4htpg6FIR/Javg ACnX23qFVvD/H7c8v4zhxbDySHUNKOw/zBxK+IVRjK4/gUsxlLIJjuu65b49s9lcdqmR MZwTIQj0ebf35B99+XkBWOPvqPK7YlUmgTb+lyS7u9hTohUTTWHMvJ2nPIvZE2bCV0YD kpIPyttG9DPhJxsNbn2fyUYZeHRXP6XwZ0iyeNthg8YHNNi64/mBRgBRizjuUH+AqZDx SzFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWLBHPtp/uV0MPHnjHTtxg43sG+defrUhnHy7C05WT7fD0Hu9A7 WF4Q8nCafkDpVNU9uoh1GyaZqbIsAofe1ojThCA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz3n5rSqcszS96ziGQw75rP1kFUkVBoi3oVPJtSGGzo+2DGwRRQosItb+esWAiX970dKAuJAS/MGBp4Mn8S01Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:693:: with SMTP id f19mr13621187qkh.476.1571923071749; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 06:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MN2PR13MB358245819050F944B107218E858F0@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <CAA=duU0Wo8EOqdcgFTCGmNoO=6wjOm_93Jg0dCDywU3OUAH5JA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERnSrkNK+jv3DrG559vvSd-WxEm5sAjSa=M_-Z2OSRh+Ug@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR13MB3582030E6350C72D02E3C8E885850@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <PU1PR06MB2215DB915457ECD1827105E5DA910@PU1PR06MB2215.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com> <CAG4d1rc8-_Ma4B-AYY9VW2imO0FVFh8mjKP2nFdfG77P3=Y3Hw@mail.gmail.com> <BN8PR13MB262827F0B4C95A3CC844100885690@BN8PR13MB2628.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN8PR13MB262827F0B4C95A3CC844100885690@BN8PR13MB2628.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 09:17:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU03rS5dcehes014nCG13_cec4=WiVakuQOTBEECX0mK0g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RE: solicit feedback for adding Interconnection among different Cloud DCs to draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-03
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004e55970595a7dc7e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/GY3sBrUUnfLT1k3UepAfu_Q6aOg>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:17:55 -0000

I think the slides in Linda's email show that the draft has captured ONUG's
use cases (I've omitted the slides from this reply to save everyone's BW
and disk space).  At this point, is there any further reason to delay WGLC?

Thanks,
Andy

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 5:05 PM Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
wrote:

> Alia,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
>
>
> Here are the updates from Last week’s ONUG on Cloud: Every ONUG have IT
> user communities voting for the use cases they care the most. The highest
> voted use case from ONUG Fall 2019 is *Hybrid Multi-cloud deployments
> incorporating VPCs/VNETs hosted by multiple public cloud providers, access
> to many SaaS application & Integration with SD-WAN overlays*.
>
>
>
> I don’t mean that  “SDWAN as the unifying API for the network fabric”,
> instead, the network fabric would be combination of legacy VPNs (AWS’
> DirectConnect, Azure’s Express Route) and over the top SDWAN.
>
>
>
>
> Linda
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email