Re: retry: interest in composite links
"So, Ning" <ning.so@verizonbusiness.com> Wed, 10 November 2010 10:07 UTC
Return-Path: <ning.so@verizonbusiness.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733DE28C0EF for <rtgwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 02:07:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TChcnlXheU1g for <rtgwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 02:07:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ashesmtp01.verizonbusiness.com (ashesmtp01.verizonbusiness.com [198.4.8.163]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6983A6807 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 02:07:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omzismtp01.vzbi.com ([unknown] [165.122.46.164]) by firewall.verizonbusiness.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.03 32bit (built May 29 2009)) with ESMTP id <0LBN0042MYTD8U90@firewall.verizonbusiness.com> for rtgwg@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:08:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from omzismtp01.vzbi.com ([unknown] [127.0.0.1]) by omzismtp01.vzbi.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.03 32bit (built May 29 2009)) with ESMTP id <0LBN00M95YTC0H00@omzismtp01.vzbi.com> for rtgwg@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:08:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ASHSRV142.mcilink.com ([unknown] [153.39.68.168]) by omzismtp01.vzbi.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.03 32bit (built May 29 2009)) with ESMTP id <0LBN00M1LYTB0O00@omzismtp01.vzbi.com> for rtgwg@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:08:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ASHEVS008.mcilink.com ([153.39.69.147]) by ASHSRV142.mcilink.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:07:59 +0000
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB80BF.262D3F5E"
Subject: Re: retry: interest in composite links
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:07:57 +0000
Message-id: <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA20606000485ED70@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-topic: retry: interest in composite links
Thread-index: AcuAl2afQICzT9DSQ42Zkquk0ONsSAABYMkuAAFuvIAAByBY4A==
From: "So, Ning" <ning.so@verizonbusiness.com>
To: "McDysan, David E (Dave)" <dave.mcdysan@verizon.com>, akatlas@gmail.com, rtgwg@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2010 10:07:59.0288 (UTC) FILETIME=[27135B80:01CB80BF]
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:07:36 -0000
I am very much in synch with Dave's comments. As a co-author, I would have like to see the capability in our network last year :) Ning ----- Original Message ----- From: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org> To: McDysan, David E (Dave); Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>; rtgwg@ietf.org <rtgwg@ietf.org> Sent: Wed Nov 10 06:43:54 2010 Subject: RE: retry: interest in composite links I forgot to include another draft that is also a potential solution to some composite link requirements: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-yong-pwe3-lfc-fat-pw-01.txt Thanks, Dave ________________________________________ From: Mcdysan, David E Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 1:16 AM To: Alia Atlas; rtgwg@ietf.org Subject: RE: retry: interest in composite links As a co-author, my response may be biased, but here it is. :) Thanks, Dave ________________________________________ From: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org [rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alia Atlas [akatlas@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 12:23 AM To: rtgwg@ietf.org Subject: retry: interest in composite links I would like to better understand the interest and enthusiasm for the composite links work. Do you: a) Agree/disagree that the problem exists and is interesting? YES b) Look to it to solve existing known issues in your networks (or those of your customers)? YES c) Plan to actively contribute by doing timely reviewing and commenting on drafts? YES d) Intend to submit related solutions architecture drafts to meet the requirements? YES. Composite link framework. Some solution drafts are already emerging, ones which cite this requirements draft are: - http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-wang-ccamp-latency-te-metric-01.txt - Other drafts are emerging that may meet some of the requirements, and I suggest that people interested in this topic take a look at them and comment: - http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zhang-ccamp-srlg-fa-configuration-01.txt - http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-05.txt - http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kompella-mpls-entropy-label-01.txt - http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kompella-mpls-rsvp-ecmp-00.txt e) I'm just watching - do you have more popcorn? What timeframe do you want to see this work move along in? i) Yesterday would have been good... YES. ii) Can we reach consensus on an implementable solution in the next year? I hope so. iii) It'll take years - and that's ok. Unfortunately, that is increasingly becoming the IETF way. :( iv) It's supposed to complete sometime? There has been very little discussion on the mailing list. More is the best way of helping progress to occur between meetings. Thanks, Alia P.S. Sorry for the missend. _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
- Re: retry: interest in composite links Alia Atlas
- retry: interest in composite links Alia Atlas
- Re: retry: interest in composite links Tony Li
- RE: retry: interest in composite links Mcdysan, David E
- RE: retry: interest in composite links Mcdysan, David E
- Re: retry: interest in composite links Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
- Re: retry: interest in composite links So, Ning
- RE: retry: interest in composite links Yong Lucy
- Re: retry: interest in composite links Curtis Villamizar
- Question on component link announcement aggregati… So, Ning
- RE: Question on component link announcement aggre… Yong Lucy
- RE: Question on component link announcement aggre… Yong Lucy
- Re: Question on component link announcement aggre… Tony Li
- RE: Question on component link announcement aggre… So, Ning
- RE: Question on component link announcement aggre… John E Drake
- RE: Question on component link announcement aggre… So, Ning
- RE: Question on component link announcement aggre… Yong Lucy
- RE: Question on component link announcement aggre… John E Drake
- RE: Question on component link announcement aggre… Yong Lucy
- RE: Question on component link announcement aggre… So, Ning
- Re: Question on component link announcement aggre… Tony Li