Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-09.txt
John G. Scudder <jgs@bgp.nu> Fri, 09 March 2007 09:06 UTC
Return-path: <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HPb3N-0004FG-Bj; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 04:06:21 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HPQhK-0004wW-A5 for rtgwg@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:02:54 -0500
Received: from bgp.nu ([64.27.28.76]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HPQhH-0002KW-CN for rtgwg@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:02:54 -0500
Received: from localhost (bgp.nu [64.27.28.76]) by bgp.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FDC53F3E6 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:02:42 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bgp.nu
Received: from bgp.nu ([64.27.28.76]) by localhost (bgp.nu [64.27.28.76]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rUsQ1B5RZQa2 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:02:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [172.16.13.202] (dsl093-003-111.det1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.3.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bgp.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624EF53F3E8 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:02:36 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <162A2C0C1CEA634AA00E00ACCC9120C6031B89CF@USDALSMBS03.ad3.ad.alcatel.com>
References: <162A2C0C1CEA634AA00E00ACCC9120C6031B89CF@USDALSMBS03.ad3.ad.alcatel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <0F1FB033-9BCC-47A4-910B-81415835E84A@bgp.nu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@bgp.nu>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:02:26 -0500
To: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9ed51c9d1356100bce94f1ae4ec616a9
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-09.txt
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: rtgwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org
Folks, There have been no comments during the WGLC period. In this case, bearing in mind the generally positive past reception for the draft, I'm inclined to apply the "silence equals consent" heuristic. We'll plan to send the draft to the IESG as Proposed Standard right after our meeting in Prague. --John On Feb 16, 2007, at 9:57 PM, ZININ Alex wrote: > Folks- > > This is to start a two-week WG Last Call on the GTSM spec for > submission > to > the IESG for publication as Proposed Standard. The Last Call ends on > March 2nd, > 2007. Please send your comments to the list. > > The document is available here: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-09.txt > > Abstract: > > The use of a packet's Time to Live (TTL) (IPv4) or Hop Limit (IPv6) > to verify whether the packet was originated by an adjacent node > on a > connected link has been used in many recent protocols. This > document > generalizes this technique. This document obsoletes RFC 3682. > > -- > Alex Zinin > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > rtgwg@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg > _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
- Last Call: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-09.txt ZININ Alex
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-09.txt John G. Scudder