Re: 6LSA IETF Drafts
Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Fri, 22 July 2005 22:28 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dw60n-0002eU-4b; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 18:28:57 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DSugv-0003Dt-5g; Tue, 03 May 2005 06:31:49 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA27857; Tue, 3 May 2005 06:31:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mtagate3.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.152]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DSuum-0004eQ-NH; Tue, 03 May 2005 06:46:09 -0400
Received: from d12nrmr1707.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1707.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.81]) by mtagate3.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j43AVcJl158824; Tue, 3 May 2005 10:31:38 GMT
Received: from d12av04.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av04.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.229]) by d12nrmr1707.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j43AVc5p249922; Tue, 3 May 2005 12:31:38 +0200
Received: from d12av04.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av04.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j43AVcsT015824; Tue, 3 May 2005 12:31:38 +0200
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d12av04.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j43AVc6U015815; Tue, 3 May 2005 12:31:38 +0200
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-145-129-244.de.ibm.com [9.145.129.244]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA92776; Tue, 3 May 2005 12:31:37 +0200
Message-ID: <4277530A.3070901@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 12:31:38 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
References: <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B087EE13D@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net> <04fc01c54bf9$f7083fa0$1c849ed9@Puppy>
In-Reply-To: <04fc01c54bf9$f7083fa0$1c849ed9@Puppy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b7b9551d71acde901886cc48bfc088a6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 18:28:51 -0400
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: 6LSA IETF Drafts
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: rtgwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org
Adrian, There is one important difference, which is that the M in MPLS stands for multiprotocol. A label switched architecture for one particular network layer protocol is not the same as a multiprotocol architecture. Brian Adrian Farrel wrote: > Jim, > > Thanks for the heads-up. > > Please ensure that any BOF you hold does not conflict with either the MPLS > or CCAMP working group meetins. I predict that many people will wish to > attend all three meetings. > > After a preliminary reading of draft-chakravorty-6lsa-01.txt it seems to > me that what you are suggesting has massive overlap with MPLS and GMPLS. > That you are proposing a form of layer 3 switching which is not part of > MPLS or GMPLS (but which has been suggested at several previous IETF > meetings) is a fairly minor fact since the data plane operation of > swapping and switching is unchanged. That is, you are proposing a new form > of labeling. > > The bigger difference comes in how the labels are distributed, and in this > context, one might ask what is wrong with existing label distribution > schemes. > > But clearly I need to read in more detail. > > Cheers, > Adrian > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com> > To: <ipv6@ietf.org> > Cc: <rtgwg@ietf.org> > Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 7:34 PM > Subject: 6LSA IETF Drafts > > > Folks, > > See below draft and two attached that will be available after the IETF. > It provides a solution for IPv6 Label Switch Architecture that does not > compete with MPLS or QOS work in progress in the industry at ITU, etc. > > http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chakravorty-6lsa-01.txt > > If some of you would do me a favor and review and send comments to Sham > Chakravorty schakra@mitre.org, Jim.Bound@nav6tf.org, and Kevin Zhang > kzhang@mitre.org I would appreciate it. We will have a BOF most likely > on 6LSA at the Paris meeting to see if this would be its own working > group. We will set up industry list for technical persons to work on it > until then if we get enough responses. I am pretty sure we should do > this here in the IETF not go to the ITU. Also we will be at the > Minneapolis IETF so if you have in person comments that is appreciate > too. > > Thanks > /jim > > > > > > >>_______________________________________________ >>Rtgwg mailing list >>Rtgwg@ietf.org >>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg >> > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ Rtgwg mailing list Rtgwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
- 6LSA IETF Drafts Bound, Jim
- Re: 6LSA IETF Drafts Adrian Farrel
- Re: 6LSA IETF Drafts Adrian Farrel
- Re: 6LSA IETF Drafts Brian E Carpenter