IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 06 February 2017 23:53 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0DF12952D; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 15:53:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U0JSqdR5e0jq; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 15:53:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DF4C129513; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 15:53:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11786; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1486425209; x=1487634809; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=PkaROT7x2lO9S1/cqoEF1AbCfe9H0b/p7JcWzE9Pbho=; b=jDQTI186ggLsWzRj/j2boEFFpXNuXE36RbF5fUK0wZXMx+HbMQ/liNYo dodEraBj5mowYH3+gGQhCachlIge3n+7kRRlSNvv3WML2scGLOXHIZK82 GfS6I2N9m5ItKQ+rINFriUNoXwt/UmupwHVQ3wUcDXk1tV5TyIFXUp/SV s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AVAQC6C5lY/4oNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm9kYYEJB41Zkg2IDId/hSyCDIYiAoJUPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFiKIRpAQEBBB1RBgUQAgEIEQMBAigHIREUCQgCBAENBYlbAxWxfyuHDw2ECgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2LO4JRgVURATwWhS8Fmy44AY1xhBeBe4UXiXCKLoREhBkBHzh2CE8VPIZCdYZxgSGBDAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,344,1477958400"; d="scan'208,217";a="209096801"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 06 Feb 2017 23:53:27 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v16NrRFX011716 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 6 Feb 2017 23:53:27 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 18:53:26 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 18:53:26 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain
Thread-Topic: Last Call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain
Thread-Index: AQHSgKfIF0qrMV8pW02nKNy31qPno6FcpxUA
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 23:53:26 +0000
Message-ID: <D4BE763D.9BB34%acee@cisco.com>
References: <B3277A36-1A7A-4C45-A931-699FE2B2C85A@gmail.com> <0FC4166F-3CB3-4344-95C1-145CCEA1F467@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0FC4166F-3CB3-4344-95C1-145CCEA1F467@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D4BE763D9BB34aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/MEJzYAUgfNYj9NjKE2KbtvQd2_E>
Cc: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 23:53:31 -0000

I support as a co-author. This IETF YANG model is currently referenced by a number or the other protocol models for specification of authentication keys including OSPF, IS-IS, RIP, and VRRP.

Thanks,
Acee
P.S. Not aware of any IPR in case you want to ask again ;^)

From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, February 6, 2017 at 1:35 PM
To: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>>
Cc: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:alias-bounces@ietf.org>>
Resent-To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>, Jeffrey Zhang <zzhang@juniper.net<mailto:zzhang@juniper.net>>, <derek@arrcus.com<mailto:derek@arrcus.com>>, Helen Chen <ichen@kuatrotech.com<mailto:ichen@kuatrotech.com>>, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com<mailto:yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>>, <yi.yang@sockrate.com<mailto:yi.yang@sockrate.com>>
Resent-Date: Monday, February 6, 2017 at 1:35 PM

Dear RTGWG,

There have been significant changes to the draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain draft.
We would like the wg to review the updated draft and hence start another, 1 week long WGLC.

Please indicate support/ no-support by February 13, 2017.

Thanks,
Jeff & Chris

From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>>
Date: Friday, September 9, 2016 at 16:11
To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>>
Cc: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>>, <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain@ietf.org>>
Subject: Last Call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain

Dear RTGWG,

The authors have requested the RTGWG to last call draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain


There was consensus that document is ready for the last call during the last IETF meeting and the authors have addressed all the comments from Directorate QA review.
Please indicate support or no-support by September 23rd, 2016.


IPR:
If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this email.
of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list.
The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each
individual that has contributed to the document.


Thanks,
Jeff & Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email