RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-02.txt

Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@huawei.com> Tue, 25 July 2017 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6751317B1 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dAXf7O35Sqgr for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4831C13188D for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO LHREML713-CAH.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DLG95119; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:58:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.38) by LHREML713-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:58:05 +0100
Received: from SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.240]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.153]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:58:03 -0700
From: Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>
To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-02.txt
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHTBVNHeBn6PDXetUSgX5zL9ERSYKJkobXg
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:58:03 +0000
Message-ID: <25B4902B1192E84696414485F572685401A36DC7@SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com>
References: <150099328637.26147.883922837159675493@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <150099328637.26147.883922837159675493@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.212.247.217]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020202.59775CB0.0205, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.5.240, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 10aabb1afe1bc90c1e4d74061b9bc0f6
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/O32BAe3gRQN53Dc4QpuUskaeFzM>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:59:00 -0000

Dear All,

As indicated,  https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/current/msg06254.html this document has been refreshed.

Please feel free to provide comments/suggestions.
--
Uma C.

-----Original Message-----
From: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 7:35 AM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-02.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group WG of the IETF.

        Title           : LFA selection for Multi-Homed Prefixes
        Authors         : Pushpasis Sarkar
                          Shraddha Hegde
                          Chris Bowers
                          Uma Chunduri
                          Jeff Tantsura
                          Bruno Decraene
                          Hannes Gredler
	Filename        : draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-02.txt
	Pages           : 16
	Date            : 2017-07-25

Abstract:
   This document shares experience gained from implementing algorithms
   to determine Loop-Free Alternates for multi-homed prefixes.  In
   particular, this document provides explicit inequalities that can be
   used to evaluate neighbors as a potential alternates for multi-homed
   prefixes.  It also provides detailed criteria for evaluating
   potential alternates for external prefixes advertised by OSPF ASBRs.
   This documents updates and expands some of the "Routing Aspects" as
   specified in Section 6 of [RFC5286].



The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-02
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-02

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-02


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg