IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Isis-wg] FW: I-D Action: draft-white-openfabric-00.txt

"Russ White" <7riw77@gmail.com> Tue, 07 March 2017 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <7riw77@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F48A1293E3; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 05:33:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zhkNQylUp30p; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 05:33:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x242.google.com (mail-qk0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99827129416; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 05:33:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x242.google.com with SMTP id n141so620999qke.3; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 05:33:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=UWQRR2DemsbgY+IV6p9drAdqT1gnzLT1ExcN3XO3VhQ=; b=vOh9iefSC5JpxuGafq6r30gC+tlD+j6z7X5ZOzW/Hp7rnx+Pf5K3EzcGFqTOaHrEIR KwJnsu+Ik29em4pvrQJJYOnwN2nqLwgM8Y2vNa3NZQRli0HVTwyjZpvq+ikkaXvn9Vvt o4X8ZtYxsenhwaijW8PhNxd8iuR+I9JaPQvQde5YvmCRWM/r6OOWmqXNU6RXjPYezo5a Axm7QdYARp0HaTzHNmrnjWmhlyoj9fe1nYJqIQxEbryKb82HgnFq3Zl7yNaThD+eoLgP +p2mkTWCvFwG+kpGTtZHOFn3jIy3ApANDm6+/pBp5QyDe4EzD3hEqm9bExQvVcV/rftT cVlA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=UWQRR2DemsbgY+IV6p9drAdqT1gnzLT1ExcN3XO3VhQ=; b=hgp6eo0bzoAkvcfTQ6LXcbWRUTFh1eoWjmLz7O3LTNEGd7KU5+A/wxR2ehyI+Xvmtp Lfwgd2YOQZh0+yoBQuVJ0ObQaZYxmQne0DYv3+AQMgbfXrA5gdNlVI7Nj3VvnRRo4bHO 9HRMAjOhotulXI8ijfoZWVOfeEzuv2DGzAp2RVXsKqcKwAWssIum0subMvHAUobnrDIr 39RQkd5arz8R1vWI213KZYfhSrhlOh+qYJHO9laMX1zduh+W34eCRadVaRIoTa7u4RjW 2x+T1W7LPvu/hMRXuEWpiQR4oII0vQa2SkjaN+WRBdyddYj9EYl61VrTBCM2/Gz04+Bh Ifhg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mlIneK46ndAhic2N34bnQORddvczMp8/3rIEuSdVeBKvmnVXnhUYCJlJWJLFWK8A==
X-Received: by 10.37.172.198 with SMTP id x6mr153197ybd.7.1488893630636; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 05:33:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Russ (162-229-180-77.lightspeed.rlghnc.sbcglobal.net. [162.229.180.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a11sm16765ywe.1.2017.03.07.05.33.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Mar 2017 05:33:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Russ White <7riw77@gmail.com>
To: "'Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)'" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, 'Hannes Gredler' <hannes@gredler.at>, rtgwg@ietf.org, isis-wg@ietf.org
References: <148856628065.15830.3525312125332246258.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <02ee01d296e9$ec570d00$c5052700$@gmail.com> <4e4d4333-9a0e-1e03-955a-cdf9b7072373@gredler.at> <e27228386ae84cc9adc22549ebafbea0@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <e27228386ae84cc9adc22549ebafbea0@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
Subject: RE: [Isis-wg] FW: I-D Action: draft-white-openfabric-00.txt
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 08:33:47 -0500
Message-ID: <013701d29747$733c2780$59b47680$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQNWQt4E90XAKMHWxi2c/u65al3g3gG7LIHEAm3O8PcCVVa30p5OFk8g
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/O8PB5LS2N4hleqaAkfLEm_FbloY>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 13:33:52 -0000

> If the state of the bit is modified as part of the flooding I don't see
how this
> works since it would also require recalculation of the
> checksum/authentication hash - and the LSP would no longer "look like" the
> original.

You are correct -- I missed this. It kept naggling in the back of my mind
that I wanted this to be a part of the packet, not the lsp, but I couldn't
think why. The DNR bit needs to be in the packet header, but there are no
bits there. Any ideas?

:-)

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email