IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: The RTGWG WG has placed draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

"Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)" <asechoud@cisco.com> Wed, 10 July 2019 07:35 UTC

Return-Path: <asechoud@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D0B120161; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=bfKeEs8u; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=zSBkuVjL
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9EWV4HjtCGNw; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7817D120154; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13705; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1562744133; x=1563953733; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=5aPgcE/75Npb4yqMK7zwIHnpbGY11ekdWrTPW4b8TKk=; b=bfKeEs8uZHT3savnad0ZuTHuPzwLaMo2qqvKqtOhn3mk/nwcbWeU4DjI UX790ffiQ5LCi3683dkLrWgphPaXZfbDkGc5ho+E/q2D2BzhyqVDs9tyb bz0y2BkpXRljBQQh+/xIGfuOhsOuMRWK9iqhMXylGgx4djI9N+Us/ckKm 4=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:LBmSwB86ulasMf9uRHGN82YQeigqvan1NQcJ650hzqhDabmn44+8ZR7E/fs4iljPUM2b8P9Ch+fM+4HYEW0bqdfk0jgZdYBUERoMiMEYhQslVceeBEb7K+PmRyc7B89FElRi+iLzPA==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AIAABilCVd/4gNJK1lGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUwUBAQEBCwGBFC9QA2pVIAQLKIQcg0cDhFKJekyBaiWJT4klhFSBLoEkA1QJAQEBDAEBGAEKCgIBAYRAAheCMiM0CQ4BAwEBBAEBAgEFbYU8DIVKAQEBBAEBEBEdAQEsDAsEAgEIEQMBAQErAgICHwYLHQgCBAESIoMAAYEdTQMdAQIMolQCgTiIYHGBMoJ5AQEFgQYBP0GCfg0LghIDBoE0AYRxhm0XgUA/gTgME4JMPoIaRwEBAwGBfQ2CXTKCJo5whH2IaY0VLUAJAoIZhleJPINzG4IshyGOM40wh0GBc44KAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFQOIFYcBU7KgGCQYJBN4M6hRSFCAE2coEpjioBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,473,1557187200"; d="scan'208,217";a="295837208"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 10 Jul 2019 07:35:31 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (xch-aln-008.cisco.com [173.36.7.18]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x6A7ZU4Q023774 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:35:30 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 02:35:30 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 02:35:29 -0500
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:35:29 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=5aPgcE/75Npb4yqMK7zwIHnpbGY11ekdWrTPW4b8TKk=; b=zSBkuVjLmUxP9YciQY3IZEb7v24opj0tu6TrTBCvMg0CdhoR4QQq1RY8jegp16IGvhOxMG50lHtTRLJ/5pgjvzKfkf8iB7T3SGxNP+U0Yt01yi/r3TSFSasV2UPUGFFQpmIrPrS6qWYK/ku5ArLt3CQIcyak1O3tgyXxe3d5J0k=
Received: from BYAPR11MB3255.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.177.184.148) by BYAPR11MB3127.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.177.227.224) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2052.19; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:35:28 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB3255.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::fc94:a588:c31a:be21]) by BYAPR11MB3255.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::fc94:a588:c31a:be21%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2052.020; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:35:28 +0000
From: "Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)" <asechoud@cisco.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model@ietf.org" <draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
Subject: Re: The RTGWG WG has placed draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Thread-Topic: The RTGWG WG has placed draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Thread-Index: AQHVJjqNFzKkxwtZpUqM/bSFnbn1SaamlncA//+LVQCAHQBMgA==
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:35:28 +0000
Message-ID: <F752EA90-3ABB-4618-BBD2-6B31944C173B@cisco.com>
References: <156090606508.6966.11992942280049135991.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <00d401d52851$5eb240e0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <e6b0d8b3-b842-4a9e-b502-fefa08f24e64@Spark> <BC7EE5F4-C564-4814-B2F7-D5283FEEDEB7@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <BC7EE5F4-C564-4814-B2F7-D5283FEEDEB7@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.9.190412
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=asechoud@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c8:1008::26e]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6bc552a9-a045-4cc9-0e69-08d705092e6d
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR11MB3127;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB3127:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 4
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB3127366D9CD0B21434266824C2F00@BYAPR11MB3127.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 0094E3478A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(346002)(376002)(366004)(396003)(136003)(189003)(199004)(13464003)(110136005)(36756003)(76116006)(8676002)(25786009)(316002)(14454004)(66476007)(81156014)(66556008)(66946007)(476003)(81166006)(86362001)(66446008)(2201001)(966005)(64756008)(71190400001)(5660300002)(6116002)(8936002)(71200400001)(478600001)(58126008)(606006)(2501003)(33656002)(229853002)(9326002)(46003)(102836004)(446003)(11346002)(6512007)(6306002)(2616005)(486006)(54896002)(186003)(236005)(6506007)(7736002)(6436002)(76176011)(68736007)(6246003)(2906002)(53546011)(53936002)(256004)(6486002)(99286004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR11MB3127; H:BYAPR11MB3255.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: +O0sK4bqBBR6BPKlFL8SjX3VMIr63wGqRqc2f3AJpnb2YK5TPYqe30mLyIcgzSiUYcJlpHHgI/gj8WYMjyu/qpYczzujEEORuXksgkT38ERMQTjKPhmj+oeJDUDVe+wQxZ5AYZ/fwXlI+skUaD9MUwmdxWVYP01ny894kwebmDaiuVfkQGULLcjvA47vPVpEBsgm1tuXtgmdHPmHgnokQTmhG5X1GsCEtfnw5BLC9CZi9Hv2vABO0+tYhqnijGWAQeeBWq0O9/PGuRlO8Ku74ra9HXNagzKGFS/+M+RcgiPykvSoezAa8+9YWk1qTclKvskrf8oqoedFmDnnPLP6AzAJTiEhPjBqQWHsMuwcKwRJiv1fXDs1ygy5sUs9LPNhXkUTXb2lpDjkRT7Emi/kR+dZViBwfmA993d0UPmKt/M=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F752EA903ABB4618BBD26B31944C173Bciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6bc552a9-a045-4cc9-0e69-08d705092e6d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Jul 2019 07:35:28.4680 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: asechoud@cisco.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB3127
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.18, xch-aln-008.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/Q5ZDrSdZdIxvRhuqgGzqQM2iIAs>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:35:37 -0000

Hello Tom,

Comments are incorporated in the latest version:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model/

Regards,
Aseem


From: "Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)" <asechoud@cisco.com>
Date: Friday, June 21, 2019 at 1:42 PM
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model@ietf.org" <draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
Subject: Re: The RTGWG WG has placed draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

Hi Tom, Jeff,

We will be working on it before IETF105.

-thanks,
Aseem

From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, June 21, 2019 at 1:40 PM
To: "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model@ietf.org" <draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
Subject: Re: The RTGWG WG has placed draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>
Resent-To: <asechoud@cisco.com>, <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, <nstrahle@juniper.net>, <exa@dscp.org>, <ing-wher_chen@jabil.com>
Resent-Date: Friday, June 21, 2019 at 1:39 PM

Tom,

Thanks for your comments!
Co-authors - please work on these, I’d also expect you to have them incorporated in the version to be presented at IETF105.

Cheers,
Jeff
On Jun 21, 2019, 9:50 AM -0700, tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>, wrote:

The challenge I have in reviewing this I-D is the lack of references in
the YANG modules for the objects and actions defined therein. I like to
have references since they tell me how much I should expect to
understand, how familiar I should be with the material.

Here we now have references for the YANG import statements (which is
good) but we should also have references for many of the YANG
statements; look for example at
draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-15
for an I-D with a comprehensive list of references in the YANG module.

It may be that here RFC 2697, RFC 2698, RFC3289 are all I need to know
but I would like to be told that before I start looking into the YANG.

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "IETF Secretariat" <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 2:01 AM


The RTGWG WG has placed draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model in state
Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Jeff Tantsura)

The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model/

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email