RE: Last Call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip

Vikram Choudhary <vikram.choudhary@huawei.com> Tue, 21 February 2017 06:35 UTC

Return-Path: <vikram.choudhary@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F123B129B65; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:35:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e-GLxah6r5UC; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:35:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E28A129B5E; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:35:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DBG15632; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 06:35:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from BLREML702-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.171) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 06:35:38 +0000
Received: from BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.20.5.38]) by blreml702-cah.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:05:28 +0530
From: Vikram Choudhary <vikram.choudhary@huawei.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Last Call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip
Thread-Topic: Last Call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip
Thread-Index: AQJb5pLumUD6swPC0EhBLnbTOGbnHqBgS63A
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 06:35:28 +0000
Message-ID: <99F160A7D70E22438C8ECB52BDB54B700282997B@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <75F657E4-6AEF-4B49-A87F-FCC5734B91EF@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <75F657E4-6AEF-4B49-A87F-FCC5734B91EF@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.153.59]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_99F160A7D70E22438C8ECB52BDB54B700282997BBLREML509MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020205.58ABDFBC.030D, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 14d7c41fc36acbc40719c701b911a32b
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/R-MNW8PhPL2ZS_aIr1xtAtj0Rt4>
Cc: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 06:35:45 -0000

Hi WG,

From: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura
Sent: 07 February 2017 06:25
To: RTGWG
Cc: rtgwg-chairs
Subject: Last Call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip

Dear RTGWG,

The authors have requested the RTGWG to last call draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip


There was consensus that document is ready for the last call during the last IETF meeting and the authors have addressed all the comments from YANG-Doctors review.
Please indicate support or no-support by February 21st, 2017.

[Vikram] Support as co-author.


IPR:
If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this email.
of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list.
The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each
individual that has contributed to the document.

[Vikram]: I am not aware of any IPR related to this document.

Regards,
Vikram


Thanks,
Jeff & Chris