Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-04.txt

Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 25 March 2021 23:05 UTC

Return-Path: <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2E13A0E0A for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EqDcUkTj7B5u for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B30EC3A0E08 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id 32so3346540pgm.1 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=sauGYf6fByaA/gmNyGik4VO+zwU6YOZtAw3PnO9a5YI=; b=J5CtniDFfZrfY5R7eH3U1cH0VP2D/HAuiPhuyHLtgpEzYnktvhiTv81Hg/mW1aj/I1 waLrXFHIczTfbDKRMMb4PsM1ao23WpG8LzLpowMyRt0flGev+sAdlh6wJKNboZClcA6z 26hxnKWfb38curbwBd/KkiaYIN2RnjbQAzISPqa/czF40efIgKVJkb8wAnZgeFvGnt5X uZx3DTmDCepN1fwIgj2BSHkvPdwxVyIgXXISCnS1wW2837eTGa9xdBoeti5xNE/qCPqq d6/xosXuM0rY8pA2gim96poaXb7Gpb2oWXnI0jqQW4Q+JsM4pCvUMLX9z++F6Penqzty SQeA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=sauGYf6fByaA/gmNyGik4VO+zwU6YOZtAw3PnO9a5YI=; b=KeFxGRKz5DVhi6jn8D60dwzNP64+2uiD5FJkn837siatbEo3Z/h+JNvjycKIOFGm9n zUzIVyhGW/gu9/9BbIHwG3Qm+DDURNkc+VINFvq8L71hSBidvrf3EWGTYQKtVfYeYf4h M/WuNAfTJ/SIAQHYDuW5dwJVgHlMsh5F6L9B6nqYgoGRoel3LPgBusbcA4LM/96IpfwP s++n9dzG4RkTtZ6+uj2lJ2+h0zV8zq7IljKfFrhblkf4GLt4e7HL0I6FJCDBWh628ZNg bF5jbBiwUj74C1xSI5Cj/Nnv6vIHO4AiunH9mOPVhgxcIIQVZghlP13j8vv5l4ZV/tsF dZIw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531f9dyH27YclKDHekwmXZa6hGwAo0A0ECI5qtTYZrsKn7HmXiUT OTwQ0uRDnE90qL2QNoLEwA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPuIa0jZksHnrGwuLanEhO5PzC1epWyeeN82nxOTvoWAJt1XfTYG7fh3dwNrTeGiRnDo8gUw==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8751:0:b029:222:3ef7:6492 with SMTP id g17-20020aa787510000b02902223ef76492mr3234352pfo.75.1616713548575; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:646:9702:c61:5873:ccbb:eec4:690c? ([2601:646:9702:c61:5873:ccbb:eec4:690c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k17sm6588394pfa.68.2021.03.25.16.05.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.40.0.2.32\))
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-04.txt
From: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5EFA1204.2080803@btconnect.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:05:45 -0700
Cc: routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1C36697B-ECA9-4052-8B4F-F6170B65B7F9@gmail.com>
References: <5EFA1204.2080803@btconnect.com>
To: t petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.40.0.2.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/RUTSq1sLXjQ_1yOWJBFEJgfcwcU>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 23:06:00 -0000

Hi Tom,

Thank you for the review and comments, really appreciate. Sorry for the delay of response.

We’ve addressed your comments in the latest version, but forgot to reply to this email. We’d like to get this draft ready for WG LC, so please let us know if you have more comments.


Thanks,
Yingzhen

> On Jun 29, 2020, at 9:08 AM, t petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> wrote:
> 
> I think that this I-D needs a few tweaks.
> 
> 'RIB'  'a RIB '' the RIB' all appear and I like consistency; since boxes
> can have multiple RIBs, I suspect 'a RIB' is best.
> 
> 'route' v 'path' - RFC8349 consciously decided that path did not mean
> much and so the term does not appear; here 'path' seems to used without
> a clear differentation from 'route'
> 
> s.3.2 'Ipv4'
> 
> s3.3 'operational state'
> should this be an NMDA datastore?
> 
> s.5
> 'import' statements need 'reference' clauses, all of them
> 
>          Datastore Architecture (NDMA) as described in RFC 8242.
> perhaps 8342
> 
>           leaf total-active-routes {
> what is an active route? what criterion can be applied to pick them out
> of a RIB?
> 
>             "The tag is a 32-bit opaque value associate ...
> /associate/associated/
> 
> Not sure but
> OLD
>             "The application-specific tag is an additional tag that
>              can be used applications that require semantics and/or
>              policy different from that of the tag. For example,
>              the tag is usually automatically advertised in OSPF
>              AS-External Link State Advertisements (LSAs) while this
>              application-specific tag is not advertised implicitly.";
> NEW
>             "The application tag is an additional tag that
>              can be used by applications that require semantics and/or
>              policy different from that of the tag. For example,
>              the tag is usually advertised in OSPF
>              AS-External Link State Advertisements (LSAs) while this
>              application tag is not advertised";
> 'implicitly' does not make sense to me and the juxtaposition of 'tag'
> and 'application tag' may confuse and using 'tag' in so many other
> places may confuse more; time for a typedef? (tag also appears already
> in RFC8349 but not, sadly, in RFC8294)
> 
> MULTI seems to have lost an I
> 
> OSPF. ECMP could do with references
> 
> 
> s.7
> "      name: ietf-acl namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-rib-
>        extension prefix: ietf-rib-ext reference: RFC XXXX "
> 
> oh dear
> 
> Appendix B should use documentation addresses not 10.  192.1.
> 
> The IESG have been known to reject examples that do not include some
> IPv6
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>> To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
>> Cc: <rtgwg@ietf.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 11:12 PM
>> Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-04.txt
>> 
>> 
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>>> This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group WG of the
>> IETF.
>>> 
>>>         Title           : RIB YANG Data Model
>>>         Authors         : Acee Lindem
>>>                           Yingzhen Qu
>>>         Filename        : draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-04.txt
>>>         Pages           : 22
>>>         Date            : 2020-06-25
>>> 
>>> Abstract:
>>>    The Routing Information Base (RIB) is a list of routes and their
>>>    corresponding administrative data and operational state.
>>> 
>>>    RFC 8349 defines the basic building blocks for RIB, and this model
>>>    augments it to support multiple next-hops (aka, paths) for each
>> route
>>>    as well as additional attributes.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cyingzhen.qu%40futurewei.com%7Ca45d1006ab5f472f2ea508d81c46d0b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637290437767295887&amp;sdata=T3%2BMwjOJoWg4etTems7m%2FDZS83txUza7BUnnMKp1GWc%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> 
>>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-04&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cyingzhen.qu%40futurewei.com%7Ca45d1006ab5f472f2ea508d81c46d0b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637290437767295887&amp;sdata=DSeJQizkNOW4EtedOp5rlgpLX%2FfNu1FMmCTRdP2nDj0%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> 
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-0&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cyingzhen.qu%40futurewei.com%7Ca45d1006ab5f472f2ea508d81c46d0b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637290437767295887&amp;sdata=B7bKkS%2By8nI8wUtdVbVxnow1DExp7t23fLisKZuzbjs%3D&amp;reserved=0
>> 4
>>> 
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Frfcdiff%3Furl2%3Ddraft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-04&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cyingzhen.qu%40futurewei.com%7Ca45d1006ab5f472f2ea508d81c46d0b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637290437767295887&amp;sdata=YH0y0nObOvIqm2Fq3F3Nylu0E6yN6awmOXJk4FARTAs%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>> submission
>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>> 
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=ftp%3A%2F%2Fftp.ietf.org%2Finternet-drafts%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cyingzhen.qu%40futurewei.com%7Ca45d1006ab5f472f2ea508d81c46d0b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637290437767295887&amp;sdata=fFX2a60GDIdTaGDqL1ajT7th6um5EdGtTjUqZoQiJPk%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> I-D-Announce mailing list
>>> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fi-d-announce&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cyingzhen.qu%40futurewei.com%7Ca45d1006ab5f472f2ea508d81c46d0b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637290437767295887&amp;sdata=PQj%2BvpGuhu52qgVaEUrTB99mPoC4kJ6tatl7xL4OiP0%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> Internet-Draft directories: https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fshadow.html&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cyingzhen.qu%40futurewei.com%7Ca45d1006ab5f472f2ea508d81c46d0b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637290437767295887&amp;sdata=uP51%2BFhmIvplhQ9LO8cEhMm5o1uAmHPvmQDEoKty9wk%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> or https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=ftp%3A%2F%2Fftp.ietf.org%2Fietf%2F1shadow-sites.txt&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cyingzhen.qu%40futurewei.com%7Ca45d1006ab5f472f2ea508d81c46d0b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637290437767295887&amp;sdata=k56QAmN7ER%2BzVdSFXPtcVCW0C7lIB4hRvrIdTk9o1bY%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> .
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Frtgwg&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cyingzhen.qu%40futurewei.com%7Ca45d1006ab5f472f2ea508d81c46d0b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637290437767295887&amp;sdata=8XOOsqngl%2FpA3jOwSSdHFpCfvXwUb%2BESv7EK4%2ByG7dA%3D&amp;reserved=0