IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 04 August 2017 22:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32527126D46; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z3dn5y5xEgkT; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x242.google.com (mail-pf0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896D3128BC8; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x242.google.com with SMTP id t86so2966063pfe.1; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 15:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QtUzcQ3vdYH+DVth/HuxJZtW8MYgRqrkeUPVLtwGAkg=; b=u7hh3OC0t1TSa9IYj3G6QqgHkjXBdyQ1qbVhwcptE/uiF7Ju5asFOaOrSaCctmqkDB 0cY+HhTp5QdHu7WeLjuyZEWyQWg75YWFNQ6seqZNNdlVkDAvHSHpOtiLJDDuhs+H6zta gA8gwLoUHPJAMomp6fG86kPAec2o9Qilt67hHFOcemUcIR71Jgv1U2OV40Ze0Xc+0NjZ OSxZUi69DHxzSGx5UN4ImWezhvDpayArGIKGwlSfWUXU1o+5Wy2OezdDTr/1If+gUkOW QjB3HTElmfwhjhj6igdHRAd44/Rjvq83ivCmUybNqn7TVJFos3ZtwDY1ZY+D3k744PO2 Ca1A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QtUzcQ3vdYH+DVth/HuxJZtW8MYgRqrkeUPVLtwGAkg=; b=MRMup2ufRgCn241QbQK9IdkBAH8ri+zgDqVQi7aS9mO5I2EDTArnodkKd3FmY29Nnz 9nlPH1N0nrwtXjT9XQ92Xji2EK7o7r6fmheIwXx6b2w27uP3uP2ikOnzGW6SWPzDsDGN GKtPUqPWHHATZiGDN7b0D1OTgbBbrVRUETIHxyIO9kdjLS9iHCP1fG1e7UI76tR7FCeI KgsbLQGhcv0cJCTZ8fu6EZLAFzliLadr6c//9eghBZdMub/M1mvRXG0ONX2HrlQwOeME 3GJfJTDl4EDv/dXdWN5JqVo/tFimjonZ1b/utwGbUJAVJEbAX1uUZ26IA+wgR8qfltb7 GaYQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1107p52zX6AWO+uqo+fViQ2QPGcCcztVb5JmLtXqSbmkimz/L5g8 IeQWKw5pnL+VGQ==
X-Received: by 10.98.11.135 with SMTP id 7mr4083672pfl.45.1501884741017; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 15:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.253.230] (107-1-141-74-ip-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [107.1.141.75]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 74sm9121892pfk.58.2017.08.04.15.12.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Aug 2017 15:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.24.1.170721
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 15:12:18 -0700
Subject: Re: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Gmail <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
CC: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, "draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync@ietf.org" <draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Message-ID: <857BE46D-92EB-4F69-8D03-867B17201B3E@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync
References: <54854841-A47A-46B8-9563-4C7901179AF2@gmail.com> <a83a429f4c9a478ea2dc32fd95ea3e90@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <80BF560A-6D02-40FF-9E9D-918EDDB6F66A@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <80BF560A-6D02-40FF-9E9D-918EDDB6F66A@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/RqKsTYJw0K0IeTW0O_NZrDQ3cN8>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 22:12:24 -0000

I’m Ok with this approach.
When/if the draft gets adopted the new version would be published with the new name.

Cheers,
Jeff

P.S. Stewart – Unless you have changed your name to “Gmail”, you might want to change it to reflect your real name ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Gmail <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, August 4, 2017 at 14:48
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
Cc: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, "draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync@ietf.org" <draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync

    NP, we should also change the draft name, but suggest that is done when the adoption poll completes.
    
    Stewart
    
    Sent from my iPad
    
    > On 4 Aug 2017, at 22:44, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com> wrote:
    > 
    > I appreciate that the authors have modified the draft in response to some comments I made - and I believe the changes satisfy my concerns.
    > 
    > I support WG adoption with one significant caveat - the title of the document needs to be modified to accurately reflect the scope of the revised draft. This is now confined to defining how to advertise "routing timer parameters" - it is no longer a generalized "any flavor of routing parameter" - which is one of the points I made in my objections.
    > 
    > Please modify the name to accurately reflect the redefined scope.
    > 
    >   Les
    > 
    > 
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura
    >> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2017 12:46 PM
    >> To: RTGWG
    >> Cc: draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync@ietf.org; 'rtgwg-chairs'
    >> Subject: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync
    >> 
    >> Dear RTGWG,
    >> 
    >> The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt for draft-bryant-rtgwg-
    >> param-sync as the working group document.
    >> 
    >> WG expressed support during the last RTGWG meeting and the authors have
    >> addressed all the comments received.
    >> Please indicate support or no-support by August 18, 2017.
    >> 
    >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this
    >> email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The
    >> response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not
    >> advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
    >> author and each individual that has contributed to the document.
    >> 
    >> Cheers,
    >> Jeff
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> rtgwg mailing list
    >> rtgwg@ietf.org
    >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email