Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-10.txt
Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 30 December 2016 02:12 UTC
Return-Path: <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D270129A46 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:12:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e8nR9ve71o77 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:12:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x234.google.com (mail-yw0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1967129A3E for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:12:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x234.google.com with SMTP id r204so218313605ywb.0 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:12:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NscoQR5+rVe3V5PlgTVrUH7s9Z1Z5dRgmK05kY9zXWU=; b=Ckvj4F0BR37WQ4hqzfMqjaTECd67zTPYiiV7W9r6HEdvjXKufWXuxV15d+RRnSVNxk 9mAC8y9I/6E7tNpZveqrjqBm1vRmvsBsAJ5suVBUe5QECZzzpbTJLfxgJjr/NYWRVots ff8oCdq8L/ME84/p5+Dz4v1CnGKTNH1xLV9inC+l5DIFwu2B3KOpRWd1Kz94udXLlQKZ g8/dfZPKZ+HnaVQ5YNarNQkMNdDDDiLdgAixyqB0B/+BCI43mc7m3xLysXdEeg+bYFal 2fTpp+DNyjQo2xtasYFGBD/DaDhpwd3wiwYPY+9OhCB5ALNWUDLdXj28TUgBuFOn00Hl Us+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=NscoQR5+rVe3V5PlgTVrUH7s9Z1Z5dRgmK05kY9zXWU=; b=l2OVlBBz4swi16DMZPmRW9wPRW6c7NxHXkUh5iWnLv+GqaUuvCd6nB3TQ8cNxPWORy onkNvVvElclosUPG+wsu416zraRhndzdMavdquVEQLZtlHaB2vGh/hZLVDVAG08alDCu 1iMqp95ETjiGlRD6Soy2g2jXoIgsjJRMplr2hecCkm3EWjmDZJjxutMFuLoJp10lnNnA tRvfFx7iKdtH/+kaicAIX5aX8aD735ZxeqG552RvRKcGpB2flvZgTHBMQ1BsL3rDD+YU Pycp1JWEHk2PZKEAS+75AirTBwB/jqSG5/Bxh7E3b0YwdtnqSMLJnCSru9h45KidFWHT rH4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKh4oIkT+vGIHuEA9E+dlTHt4x/dQMU4hMmsgGYaYCEjO+LZgv+MUubuFbIoVbAvCM7KpRCV7kPuScTtA==
X-Received: by 10.129.52.6 with SMTP id b6mr28996322ywa.113.1483063926720; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:12:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.216.82 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:12:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <148306372937.30210.1448700309159401906.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <148306372937.30210.1448700309159401906.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 07:42:06 +0530
Message-ID: <CAEFuwkgKYprwD7ck6onBJHiG6uoc6--Bz5MA7Nc0QzqFHog7Lw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-10.txt
To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1149ce268811800544d6baf5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/X4FpO0-FPAA0zdu0RErEXD_Fxxk>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 02:12:09 -0000
Hi RtgWg members, Have uploaded the version below addressing Gen Art Review comments. Please feel free to review and comment on this new version. Thanks and regards, -Pushpasis ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> Date: Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 7:38 AM Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-10.txt To: Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>, Shraddha Hegde < shraddha@juniper.net>, Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net>, Hannes Gredler < hannes@rtbrick.com>, Stephane Litkowski <stephane.litkowski@orange.com> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-10.txt has been successfully submitted by Pushpasis Sarkar and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection Revision: 10 Title: Remote-LFA Node Protection and Manageability Document date: 2016-12-30 Group: rtgwg Pages: 20 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa- node-protection-10.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa- node-protection/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node- protection-10 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa- node-protection-10 Abstract: The loop-free alternates computed following the current Remote-LFA specification guarantees only link-protection. The resulting Remote- LFA nexthops (also called PQ-nodes), may not guarantee node- protection for all destinations being protected by it. This document describes an extension to the Remote Loop-Free based IP fast reroute mechanisms described in [RFC7490], that describes procedures for determining if a given PQ-node provides node- protection for a specific destination or not. The document also shows how the same procedure can be uitilized for collection of complete characteristics for alternate paths. Knowledge about the characteristics of all alternate path is precursory to apply operator defined policy for eliminating paths not fitting constraints. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-rtgw… Pushpasis Sarkar