Agenda requests for IETF 89
Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Wed, 22 January 2014 21:41 UTC
Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A647E1A0390 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:41:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5_Jlao78-Ndy for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:41:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (mail-ie0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17BD1A0383 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:41:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id ar20so162196iec.24 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:41:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mVB7SHvlkOxEKpbaMUHtbG030S4Pf60g5pYHqcGCcvs=; b=bmhW7MNJqIVs4GwfISEx4HQZ0Zfad6Uvrh+C69FBvmiVIOG2EXfGkzerSc0gYb7yoy 5UBRKhINQ7LlW0FZl+Sy4MrzyxepSGA8ewWETvp71gepaYUcQ0BI8lcxnpsMjcm86VVZ a+PvJ3ZrFr71tOi8oilplqB8Vo4sc7Rc4wUuE2WUGbOa9JpDavP8Lz++0eiBWl0G8cjv 1MKU0FAmBrZBqg72otPrhrE7zPaVrq5yNszgbPojqdmdVevv3fOo4gWMHYVO9YP6eC57 DZHAU62EoZ6fcEZsVrBjEtfcD68zGpOxC4nCLztW46RSFvIElBlVl9No8G66KjNcpm0B jE4A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.20.3 with SMTP id e3mr3180750icb.2.1390426878275; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:41:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.72.132 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:41:18 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 16:41:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rcbDOJw=-aG4b4tHSN09Vj058jcKjQePqFWfnOpJmzFAA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Agenda requests for IETF 89
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf302447bd2a769c04f095fcbe"
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 21:41:20 -0000
It is not too early to start thinking about IETF 89. Alvaro and I would
really like to get agenda requests early. We expect that drafts will have
discussion on this mailing list before hand.
The following are items that we believe will request agenda slots. PLEASE
CONFIRM and tell us how much time is needed:
draft-aumuganainar-rtgwg-dps<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-aumuganainar-rtgwg-dps-00.txt>-00:
intended for last IETF, but author couldn't make it
draft-aumuganainar-rtgwg-dps<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-aumuganainar-rtgwg-dps-00.txt>-00:
new
draft-litkowski-rtgwg-uloop-delay<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-litkowski-rtgwg-uloop-delay-01.txt>-01:
new draft expected
draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability<http://tools.ietf.org/wg/rtgwg/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability/>-01:
new draft just published
composite link/Advanced Multipath status: Trying to finish up Advanced
Multipath work
draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-03.txt>
-03
We are trying to finish up the following drafts:
draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr<http://tools.ietf.org/wg/rtgwg/draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr/>
draft-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa<http://tools.ietf.org/wg/rtgwg/draft-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa/>
draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases<http://tools.ietf.org/wg/rtgwg/draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases/>
draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement<http://tools.ietf.org/wg/rtgwg/draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement/>
and would strongly encourage discussion and comments even before WGLC is
started on them.
Thanks,
Alia
- Re: Agenda requests for IETF 89 Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- 答复: Re: Agenda requests for IETF 89 liu.bin21
- Agenda requests for IETF 89 Alia Atlas