RE: RE: RE: New Version Notification for draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-02.txt

[gengnan <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

Thanks for your response. Will have a look at them.

Best,
Nan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 杨术 <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2024 1:35 AM
> To: gengnan <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: RE: RE: New Version Notification for
> draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-02.txt
> 
> Hi, Nan,
> 
> You can refer back to the following draft, and you can see that much work have
> been done with IPv6 for src/dst routing.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing-07
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-baker-rtgwg-src-dst-routing-use-ca
> ses-02
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-baker-ipv6-ospf-dst-src-routing-03
> 
> Best,
> Shu
> 
> > -----原始邮件-----
> > 发件人: gengnan <[e-mail]>
> > 发送时间:2024-03-05 11:20:37 (星期二)
> > 收件人: 杨术 <[e-mail]>
> > 抄送: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
> > 主题: RE: RE: New Version Notification for
> > draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-02.txt
> >
> > > 2) Things will be much simpler in IPv6 scenario than IPv4.
> > Can you explain it more?
> >
> > Best,
> > Nan
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: 杨术 <yang.shu=[e-mail]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2024 1:50 AM
> > > To: gengnan <[e-mail]>
> > > Cc: 杨术 <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> > > Subject: Re: RE: New Version Notification for
> > > draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-02.txt
> > >
> > > Hi, Nan,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the comments.
> > >
> > > Yes, we only consider IPv6 in our draft, because, 1) we only
> > > implement and deploy the IPv6 version currently. 2) Things will be
> > > much simpler in IPv6 scenario than IPv4.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > Shu
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----原始邮件-----
> > > > 发件人: gengnan <gengnan=[e-mail]>
> > > > 发送时间:2024-03-03 18:31:55 (星期日)
> > > > 收件人: 杨术 <yang.shu=[e-mail]>
> > > > 抄送: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
> > > > 主题: RE: New Version Notification for
> > > > draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-02.txt
> > > >
> > > > Hi Shu,
> > > >
> > > > I had a quick look at the updated draft. A "source address table"
> > > > in data-plane
> > > can be useful in some cases.
> > > >
> > > > My basic question is why IPv4 is not in scope of this document,
> > > > though the
> > > Introduction section briefly mentions that it is due to the
> > > consideration of implementation complexity. Is the dst-src-routing not
> recommended for IPv4?
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Nan
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: rtgwg <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of 杨术
> > > > Sent: Friday, March 1, 2024 1:32 AM
> > > > To: [e-mail]
> > > > Subject: Fw: New Version Notification for
> > > > draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-02.txt
> > > >
> > > > Hi RTGWG,
> > > >
> > > > We have updated the src/dst routing draft, your comments are
> welcomed!
> > > >
> > > > Best，
> > > >
> > > > Shu
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----原始邮件-----
> > > > > 发件人: [e-mail]
> > > > > 发送时间:2024-01-31 23:49:47 (星期三)
> > > > > 收件人: "Anton Smirnov" <[e-mail]>, "David Lamparter"
> > > > > <[e-mail]>, "Jen Linkova" <[e-mail]>,
> > > > > "Mingwei Xu" <[e-mail]>, "Shu Yang"
> > > > > <[e-mail]>
> > > > > 主题: New Version Notification for
> > > > > draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-02.txt
> > > > >
> > > > > A new version of Internet-Draft
> > > > > draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-02.txt has been successfully
> > > > > submitted by Shu Yang and posted to the IETF repository.
> > > > >
> > > > > Name:     draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing
> > > > > Revision: 02
> > > > > Title:    Destination/Source Routing
> > > > > Date:     2024-01-31
> > > > > Group:    Individual Submission
> > > > > Pages:    23
> > > > > URL:
> > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-
> > > 02.txt
> > > > > Status:
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing
> > > /
> > > > > HTMLized:
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-ro
> > > uting
> > > > > Diff:
> > > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-sr
> > > c-routing-02
> > > > >
> > > > > Abstract:
> > > > >
> > > > >    This note specifies using packets' source addresses in route lookups
> > > > >    as additional qualifier to be used in hop-by-hop routing decisions.
> > > > >    This applies to IPv6 [RFC2460] in general with specific
> > > > >    considerations for routing protocol left for separate documents.
> > > > >    There is nothing precluding similar operation in IPv4, but this is
> > > > >    not in scope of this document.
> > > > >
> > > > >    Note that destination/source routing, source/destination routing,
> > > > >    SADR, source-specific routing, source-sensitive routing, S/D routing
> > > > >    and D/S routing are all used synonymously.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The IETF Secretariat
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > rtgwg mailing list
> > > > [e-mail]
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > rtgwg mailing list
> > > > [e-mail]
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg