Re: Routing Directorate Review for "Use of BGP for routing in large-scale data centers" (adding RTG WG)
Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Thu, 28 April 2016 18:33 UTC
Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9459712D51E; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oQi1Yi-5HBIn; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07F2F12D50E; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x233.google.com with SMTP id v145so60140626oie.0; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=3puOZnCee4YBB+LYql/1cwJHuNZ34V6RqejEL/AydWc=; b=IrrBTl2GcV4Vwp0jnMgLHyv0ooDzW3m0uvroCKtoLBFrbLkPGYeESRrc2xuONGVcIW 8A8ZtLddOjmt7rcYDHrJ0CMRlTl9jaJqYRlRsNdlvfcNcwh1nFtksagv7D/qLiTNnNy+ BdQPBoOsOC0pQae5MxkddY5Y+9LIJvryLBy3rsOGb9+SrIeWbKBAWHD6XYMYmZd0NhRY Fbd1Rswcv8NvID+duIJwQ2LsVB8VT/DIupo4UpWV2jbrLeMavnqgud7PnWIyBMq8fHmn 3Worb0+HyOcze/oJr/H9cgutSnZZtrHwEW97Rad0qdx0uJBck+VTYp3VsbT3/z/4Yz3s IH3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=3puOZnCee4YBB+LYql/1cwJHuNZ34V6RqejEL/AydWc=; b=JSgLfpj1/xG+VSBYJLs7sTfoBidhHYcyt6yM2ZYD4kVjvvCqr6kaV9zpvx5A4CAFuL LbAAGfv7ZtSFXSH0WcoDnXw+hdIc/UYNvjCiPoEjeV7np1aFzROvhNb4WTXtYC/bfg+K 5jEzm0IH1MlROmkctueI4dARPuH/ObgvxL2e8Czi++7P+o3YsgWtneiSffvO8x05wPoN /hvhTrrMeL0skDjMoYY6fbLaugfxrvrRBUwos4y2d3L/RMjybLhSbZjOBU6kZiAExKyu gHe6WT8Fyg6cS7IFFJ6aKJZr1yaahgMgJG/g25BxRGNTZTRsNZmRbtVfSns7gj5qgAHf wnLw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUc4cxplSKlIbkxKkyvDXAFNhUdAr611sM+YaO+hOThjDsOGQSklKAyfnOh6MF5qOOWyB0hQXisYyJgKg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.157.45.81 with SMTP id v75mr7817342ota.85.1461868413300; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.115.168 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160428005018.GB29709@puck.nether.net>
References: <D343C90F.5C211%acee@cisco.com> <CAG4d1rdt8jTcJ59X0fDnVn2sEERAyB=2gjjVAnqQ5SDvUxfG0Q@mail.gmail.com> <20160428005018.GB29709@puck.nether.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:33:33 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1re8Vm8gDk8LwP9sXT_xjXgGk-tBRwCvgBw9kUrzLBhzeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Routing Directorate Review for "Use of BGP for routing in large-scale data centers" (adding RTG WG)
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: Jon Mitchell <jrmitche@puck.nether.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113e9f667bb9f105318fc372"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/eCVxj_pQuyf2FqolnL6KRdcEnVc>
Cc: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc@ietf.org>, Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, Routing Directorate <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, Routing ADs <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 18:33:35 -0000
Jon, thank you! I'll take another read through. Alia On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Jon Mitchell <jrmitche@puck.nether.net> wrote: > On 25/04/16 15:01 -0400, Alia Atlas wrote: > > Hi Acee, > > > > Thank you very much for your review. > > > > Authors, could you please respond soon? I am hoping to get this out to > > IETF Last Call > > by Thursday - and on the telechat for May 19. That depends on timely > > updates from > > the authors and shepherd. > > Acee - thanks again for your detailed review. Alia - we've just posted > -10 which addresses the comments. > > -Jon >
- Routing Directorate Review for "Use of BGP for ro… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: Routing Directorate Review for "Use of BGP fo… Alia Atlas
- RE: Routing Directorate Review for "Use of BGP fo… Petr Lapukhov
- Re: Routing Directorate Review for "Use of BGP fo… Jon Mitchell
- Re: Routing Directorate Review for "Use of BGP fo… Alia Atlas
- Re: Routing Directorate Review for "Use of BGP fo… Acee Lindem (acee)