[RTGWG] Soliciting WG feedback and comments on draft-li-rtgwg-cc-igp-arch-00.txt
Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com> Mon, 21 October 2013 15:23 UTC
Return-Path: <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A4F11E8586 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 08:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.99
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=4.609, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C8nadDNuWYBQ for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 08:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E7211E85B4 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 08:23:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AXA47984; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:23:26 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:21:58 +0100
Received: from NKGEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.33) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:22:54 +0100
Received: from NKGEML506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.141]) by nkgeml402-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.33]) with mapi id 14.03.0146.000; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 23:22:42 +0800
From: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: [RTGWG] Soliciting WG feedback and comments on draft-li-rtgwg-cc-igp-arch-00.txt
Thread-Topic: [RTGWG] Soliciting WG feedback and comments on draft-li-rtgwg-cc-igp-arch-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOznFiF+74ijBxnUWEkbziX5GFfQ==
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:22:41 +0000
Message-ID: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D081C7E70@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <20131021022049.22740.1931.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20131021022049.22740.1931.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.76.77]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: Yangang <yangang@huawei.com>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:23:41 -0000
Hi all, We had submitted a new draft: http://tools.ietf.org/html/ draft-li-rtgwg-cc-igp-arch-00, Your feedback and comments on the RTGWG mailing list are appreciated. Please refer to following introduction on the draft: As the Software Defined Networks (SDN) solution develops, IGP will be extended to support central control. This document introduces an architecture of using IGP for central controlling. Central Control Architecture propose following requirements related with IGP: 1. Build the central control architecture between the controller and the client. It includes building connectivity, collecting the topology, and dividing multiple areas automatically, etc. 2. Many new applications are emerging under the central controlled framework, such as network virtualization, centralized MPLS TE calculation, segment routing, etc. These new applications bring extension requirement to IGP. We can look on [I-D.chen-ospf-ttz], [I-D.ylz-ospf-lsdb-sync-group], [I-D.li-ospf-ext-green-te], etc. as the concrete use cases of the central controlled IGP. We hope the architecture draft to help understand IGP usage in the central control globally and new requirements are proposed for the future development. In addition, I recommend you could read another draft " draft-li-idr-cc-bgp-arch-00" for better understanding different protocol usage in the central control architecture, Thanks, Robin -----邮件原件----- 发件人: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 发送时间: 2013年10月21日 10:21 收件人: Huaimo Chen; Lizhenbin; Yangang 主题: New Version Notification for draft-li-rtgwg-cc-igp-arch-00.txt A new version of I-D, draft-li-rtgwg-cc-igp-arch-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Zhenbin Li and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-li-rtgwg-cc-igp-arch Revision: 00 Title: An Architecture of Central Controlled Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) Creation date: 2013-10-21 Group: Individual Submission Number of pages: 11 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-li-rtgwg-cc-igp-arch-00.txt Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-rtgwg-cc-igp-arch Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-rtgwg-cc-igp-arch-00 Abstract: As the Software Defined Networks (SDN) solution develops, IGP will be extended to support central control. This document introduces an architecture of using IGP for central controlling. Some use cases under this new framework are also discussed. For specific use cases, making necessary extensions in IGP are required. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat