Re: Request for WG adoption of draft-litkowski-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement and draft-decraene-rtgwg-backoff-algo

Martin Horneffer <maho@nic.dtag.de> Tue, 28 April 2015 12:01 UTC

Return-Path: <maho@nic.dtag.de>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DCD71A8AA6 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 05:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.489
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hHOuYl4QVhnB for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 05:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from owl2.lab.dtag.de (unknown [194.25.1.238]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87C31A88AC for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 05:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by owl2.lab.dtag.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E42CC01D4 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:01:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Martins-MacBook-Air.local (unknown [85.29.8.182]) by owl2.lab.dtag.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FA98C019B for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:01:45 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <553F76A8.5080705@nic.dtag.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 15:01:44 +0300
From: Martin Horneffer <maho@nic.dtag.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Request for WG adoption of draft-litkowski-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement and draft-decraene-rtgwg-backoff-algo
References: <D1553E65.9546D%jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <D1553E65.9546D%jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/gjPP-totuNmBA_3GEUskiq14NzM>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:01:48 -0000

Full support for adoption of both drafts from my side!

With all the optimization in IGPs we got during the last decade, but 
also the increase of availability and performance requirements towards a 
converged IP backbone, this is in my opinion the next step for a better 
IP backbone that we can do.

Best regards, Martin


Am 16.04.15 um 20:24 schrieb Jeff Tantsura:
> Hi RTGWG,
>
> The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt:
> draft-litkowski-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement and
> draft-decraene-rtgwg-backoff-algo as working group documents.
>
> There was support during the last IETF meeting (92) in Dallas.
> Please indicate support or no-support by May 1st, 2015.
>
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
> The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will
> not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
> author and each individual that has contributed to the document.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Jeff & Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>