I-D Action: draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-05.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue, 24 June 2014 08:28 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39AB1B299A; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 01:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F8t_gK5XQ7Ic; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 01:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3861A01B8; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 01:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-05.txt
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.5.0.p3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20140624082840.3753.98261.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 01:28:40 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/hXGtBGjoMRoVPX52elT60i-ZxS8
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:28:42 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. Title : Remote-LFA Node Protection and Manageability Authors : Pushpasis Sarkar Hannes Gredler Shraddha Hegde Chris Bowers Stephane Litkowski Harish Raghuveer Filename : draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-05.txt Pages : 16 Date : 2014-06-24 Abstract: The loop-free alternates computed following the current Remote-LFA [I-D.ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa] specification gaurantees only link- protection. The resulting Remote-LFA nexthops (also called PQ- nodes), may not gaurantee node-protection for all destinations being protected by it. This document describes procedures for determining if a given PQ-node provides node-protection for a specific destination or not. The document also shows how the same procedure can be utilised for collection of complete characteristics for alternate paths. Knowledge about the characteristics of all alternate path is precursory to apply operator defined policy for eliminating paths not fitting constraints. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- I-D Action: draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protect… internet-drafts