RE: Generic Connection Admission Control (GCAC) Algorithm Specification for IP/MPLS Networks

Gerald Ash <gash5107@yahoo.com> Mon, 06 June 2011 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <gash5107@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A41411E81CE for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.184
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.184 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tzUXQJfhwKhR for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm21-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm21-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E156011E81CB for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.138.90.54] by nm21.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jun 2011 19:15:09 -0000
Received: from [98.138.87.4] by tm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jun 2011 19:15:09 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jun 2011 19:14:39 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 634940.18739.bm@omp1004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 86878 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Jun 2011 19:14:39 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1307387679; bh=CAdWvDJogHkcLqRFeuKn3UxFfLAQ6FvjebZjhSU6/DE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=r92JVlsopCD81BS/W+nSkk1WnJhjHbX76AEBLcLESWutQv3n1Jwaws7vnqcM/2YXC+wdtkmp7SqG+vIb76CxpHVypzLlNVQ9PZSckQTafJrVFVIwSbcT1kfLW4VU9BWQKp1A8avJAYWqVmL9GPuQI8sWMLVuo2z8RLdPSSW59fY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=wnb29YzZUzK1olWUavmfYFL2/Eg/ubk+Ux9mtrB1gomQgGQIG4ApQA6hwNM9xz9DiFC5fMVsidUFqNOjfVjvXD6VnLMTgYhro4oTb9YY2tQjDz9zRElsXSk5bglLJEGm8Btw3a6hK5PFKMNgnlqFKpjNLezGD+DhUflgJPx1dkU=;
Message-ID: <435578.85269.qm@web125906.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: t.aATosVM1kJRNhNjxCd35DbrLOuY.FPHYCWWPcCAjaeZ2V oucO.rLDi.nMOC9qeeem77EXzjCgx2lGhQXmxYTnXjYt4Pxi0OmX.2RKex9M k8s9qJdaVV9CL9.pLutHIxLVyPkggtMysNgSHl18UN2YKWTLQwSq0rm.D3ro se23C6QgdkN1lX7obJB9fx5yo7BodJo59neYt9Fs9enl06NAtx3ZTRxGKsMS 0j.EtkRNDA_Ndu61LpUUU0uWsvxjxGsCMAlp3IrqHCd0NZaGMw2rhG9XMZp6 lCqa_4UreAHTp5daGy85yGvX6O1zUG6cmpkDiyEzsf.DUaJMXgLJhKnQtx27 G4RLGZgdtCNX86A_HxJOz0e8kLJrPlEBau10_vQmJFH2fQEj1
Received: from [71.233.102.170] by web125906.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 12:14:39 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.1 YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.303096
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 12:14:39 -0700
From: Gerald Ash <gash5107@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Generic Connection Admission Control (GCAC) Algorithm Specification for IP/MPLS Networks
To: MarlaAzinger <Marla.Azinger@FTR.com>
In-Reply-To: <2E2FECEBAE57CC4BAACDE67638305F1049E24E45BC@ROCH-EXCH1.corp.pvt>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1924068722-1307387679=:85269"
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:15:13 -0000

Hi Marla,
 
Thanks for your email.  Please see responses below.

Regards,
Jerry

> 
> 
> --- On Wed, 6/1/11, Azinger, Marla <Marla.Azinger@FTR.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>  From: Azinger, Marla <Marla.Azinger@FTR.com>
>  Subject: RE: Generic Connection Admission Control (GCAC) Algorithm 
> Specification for IP/MPLS Networks
>  To: "Gerald Ash" <gash5107@yahoo.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
>  Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
>  Date: Wednesday, June 1, 2011, 11:38 AM
> 
> 
>  Jerry-
> 
>  Did you get a response from anyone on this yet?
 
I got one off-line comment 
"this work looks good to me and seems somewhat over due..."
 
Given all the experts on this topic in the MPLS WG & RTGWG, it's a bit surprising there hasn't been more response.  Not that long ago this topic would probably have generated strong reaction.

> 
>  Cheers
>  Marla
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  From: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
> Gerald Ash
>  Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 9:51 AM
>  To: rtgwg@ietf.org
>  Cc: mpls@ietf.org
>  Subject: Generic Connection Admission Control (GCAC) Algorithm 
> Specification for IP/MPLS Networks
> 
> 
>        Hi,
> 
>        Adrian has suggested that the RTGWG and the MPLS WG review the draft 
> "Generic Connection Admission Control (GCAC) Algorithm Specification for 
> IP/MPLS Networks", available at 
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ash-gcac-algorithm-spec-00.txt (abstract 
> below).
> 
>        The underlying goal of the work is to specify an optional GCAC 
> algorithm for IP/MPLS networks, to be adopted and implemented by vendors and 
> service providers, that interoperates between vendor equipment and across 
> multiple service provider domains.  This would be analogous to the PNNI GCAC 
> that was widely adopted and helped promote interoperability of ATM networks. 
> In addition, the approach:
>        o is based on CSPF, widely implemented by vendors
>        o does NOT include aspects of CAC that might be considered vendor 
> proprietary implementations, such as detailed path selection mechanisms
>        o relies on available standard mechanisms for MPLS based networks, 
> such as RSVP, DSTE, PCE...
> 
>        Comments appreciated.
> 
>        Thanks,
>        Jerry
> 
>        From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
>        To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
>        Reply-to: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
>        Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ash-gcac-algorithm-spec-00.txt
>        X-RSN: 1/0/935/34473/37870
> 
>        A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>        directories.
> 
>        Title : Generic Connection Admission Control (GCAC) Algorithm 
> Specification for IP/MPLS Networks
>        Author(s) : G. Ash, D. McDysan
>        Filename : draft-ash-gcac-algorithm-spec-00.txt
>        Pages : 23
>        Date : 2011-1-11
> 
>        This document presents a generic connection admission control (GCAC)
>        reference model and algorithm for IP/MPLS-based networks. Service
>        provider (SP) IP/MPLS networks need an MPLS GCAC mechanism, for
>        example, to reject voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) calls when
>        additional calls would adversely affect calls already in progress.
> 
>        Without MPLS GCAC, connections on congested links will suffer
>        degraded quality. The MPLS GCAC algorithm can be optionally
>        implemented in vendor equipment and deployed by service providers.
>        MPLS GCAC interoperates between vendor equipment and across multiple
>        service provider domains. The MPLS GCAC algorithm uses available
>        standard mechanisms for MPLS based networks, such as RSVP, DSTE, 
> PCE,
>        NSIS, DiffServ, and OSPF. The MPLS GCAC algorithm does not include
>        aspects of CAC that might be considered vendor proprietary
>        implementations, such as detailed path selection mechanisms. MPLS
>        GCAC functions are implemented in a distributed manner to deliver 
> the
>        objective QoS for specified QoS constraints. The source is able to
>        compute a source route with high likelihood that MPLS GCAC via
>        elements along the selected path will in fact admit the request.
>        MPLS GCAC is applicable to any service or flow that must meet an
>        objective QoS (delay, jitter, packet loss rate) for a specified
>        quantity of traffic.
> 
>        A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>        http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ash-gcac-algorithm-spec-00.txt
> 
>        Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>        ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
>        Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
>        implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
>        Internet-Draft.
>        _______________________________________________
>        I-D-Announce mailing list
>        I-D-Announce@ietf.org
>        https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>        Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
>        or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
> 
>        *****
>        Click below to download the attachment(s) in this message:
>        <A 
> HREF="http://www.ietf.org/ibin/c5i?mid=6&gid=0&rid=8&k1=935&file=i-d-announce.37870.1.txt">Attachment: 
> draft_ash_gcac_algorithm_spec_00.txt</A> (1K)
> 
>