IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-16

Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 29 April 2023 20:41 UTC

Return-Path: <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A479C151711; Sat, 29 Apr 2023 13:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mqhhwDSOKete; Sat, 29 Apr 2023 13:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe32.google.com (mail-vs1-xe32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A96CAC15170B; Sat, 29 Apr 2023 13:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe32.google.com with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-42e58fcbfb4so422523137.0; Sat, 29 Apr 2023 13:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1682800902; x=1685392902; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nlTisFbnf0RBpeaWmurxLytRy0L8Mx+KeMffO8zXdQo=; b=qvzvmPG5xAHp1cwolPugATOB2dBoTcay/pS8Iq4YHjtxvIqInbq08Ub/dfjPgH/oRk TD61LYZ7H2SpWrqBk3yRV4zinbIrUPT+slZ68ubOxIbsMrtDhTK6OlXgjeyKIJIjiaTX 9xhPRzPB9XnokleQvkEqMKO8MQxuHq1uCqwRojuIUVb4stM4whSI0Wxhv9xQFTnEoxPM cnCBBw8LCPKqazHegUYuvsCV4ouE/+G1KKmKtg5A0pBeMbN65tglnZRlC18LSTa9U4hi BuZlr0I4T22ZHL/aybN99yWztfTRdar40ZAZlWlbrukaceDZB6pdvd4yHgcJ342IIEF3 Dayw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1682800902; x=1685392902; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=nlTisFbnf0RBpeaWmurxLytRy0L8Mx+KeMffO8zXdQo=; b=f1+oBkoMVRtbZMzpD8zrf03dyBzMjlgBV6KRIWQaNa7Ki8VhLqH2C8S+HvrJWSPnL5 BYKYrPGK4OhvXZCirR2+9NhH8agR2vMGMgtyPQuHrZ0tz87rs+CmoSuOaEkmbuS3u6fU oXEaVB4QRWgA8p+fsd2JHmmI2E+YvusFlHfdtlZn0P6672FyKsdgmAYq7ONN0OpPk99+ 2/Rs1THWyhJFVG4QkZBpcWKss8gUSG19XeP9E8KC9hXWHQlA/hWI6Cyo9xflaRL4aUEf ceutMhNy8XvtDM60XjMc+g2oTL025bOGqTo29XAXFeu+oMooYynYfw6MiSBc57MAlIw2 +sQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwtuFHrYMu36sjy0MFr4kLqn+q/HFU1I7tPdXxWrVS2bp/n15/a nVXe0QMPZVMrVXLNoRmOQHgClMsvhheffykf4mwM9NA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4DyDCKaeDd9YDKdfyogpAH+qKD3TECZ6fbyQllq6zIDlvCCtlITl31lmrSgbbSfh66mkRzSS1N9j/WTwlC4kk=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:ed81:0:b0:42e:676c:bab8 with SMTP id d1-20020a67ed81000000b0042e676cbab8mr4014967vsp.16.1682800902669; Sat, 29 Apr 2023 13:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <168279075688.50198.4125814977559954425@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <168279075688.50198.4125814977559954425@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023 13:41:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CABY-gOOtK0hrCZ_AJgPrjOZF+8QrYORH+cOHpHOEBXAyNf_fiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-16
To: Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, rtgwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000080ada05fa7f9e00"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/lh0YC955OkKTb7DeImAx5Lq_SYw>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023 20:41:47 -0000

Hi Chris,

Thank you for your review. The authors are actively working with other
reviewers to make sure all nits are addressed.

Thanks,
Yingzhen

On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 10:52 AM Chris Lonvick via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Reviewer: Chris Lonvick
> Review result: Has Nits
>
> Hi,
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors.
> Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any
> other
> last call comments.
>
> First off, I am not a Yang doctor. The summary of the review is Ready with
> Nits. I've looked at the reviews of other reviewers and see that they have
> covered several details that should be addressed by the authors. I found no
> nits or problems on my own.
>
> The Security Considerations section appears to be appropriate and is well
> written. I believe that once the authors have addressed the issues raised
> by
> the other reviewers that the document will be ready.
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email