[Technical Errata Reported] RFC9067 (6844)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 10 February 2022 17:10 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14E83A045B for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 09:10:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_SBL=0.5, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tAzZ4FiP97xy for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 09:10:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB3013A0E1F for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 09:10:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id AED5B1BA3B82; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 09:10:32 -0800 (PST)
To: yingzhen.qu@futurewei.com, jefftant.ietf@gmail.com, acee@cisco.com, xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, jgs@juniper.net, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, jefftant.ietf@gmail.com, yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com
Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9067 (6844)
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: kris@netedge.plus, rtgwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220210171032.AED5B1BA3B82@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 09:10:32 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/m6ybJqNVSQLR8oFOQOgEvlNWMEA>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:10:38 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9067, "A YANG Data Model for Routing Policy". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6844 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Kris Lambrechts <kris@netedge.plus> Section: 7.2. grouping prefix Original Text ------------- leaf mask-length-upper { type uint8 { range "1..128"; } Corrected Text -------------- leaf mask-length-upper { type uint8 { range "0..128"; } Notes ----- With the original definition, it is not possible to specify an exact match for the default routes (0.0.0.0/0 and ::/0) which is a valid use case. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC9067 (draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-31) -------------------------------------- Title : A YANG Data Model for Routing Policy Publication Date : October 2021 Author(s) : Y. Qu, J. Tantsura, A. Lindem, X. Liu Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Routing Area Working Group Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9067 (6844) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9067 (6844) Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9067 (6844) Alvaro Retana