Ready for RTGwg WG adoption call for draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement & Gap analysis

Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Sat, 15 December 2018 00:18 UTC

Return-Path: <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A754C130EB1 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 16:18:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ddv3s7zHQ6fF for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 16:18:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91881130EA9 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 16:18:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 3ED392A6B94 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 00:18:21 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.39) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 00:18:22 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.185]) by SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.67]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 16:18:19 -0800
From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
CC: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>, JACQUENET Christian IMT/OLN <christian.jacquenet@orange.com>, "Mehmet Toy (mehmet.toy@verizon.com)" <mehmet.toy@verizon.com>
Subject: Ready for RTGwg WG adoption call for draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement & Gap analysis
Thread-Topic: Ready for RTGwg WG adoption call for draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement & Gap analysis
Thread-Index: AdSUCvoROHk2Q+2VQBKXROCGhxFhpw==
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 00:18:18 +0000
Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B2166F0@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.103]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/mZTkPqWNR8XthagUsW6qcEcmR0A>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 00:18:28 -0000

Jeff and Chris, 

We have made some changes based on the IETF103 discussion. 
We think the drafts are ready for WG adoption call. 
Since there is only one week left before Christmas, is it better to start the adoption call now and extend to the New Year? Or start after the New Year? 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dm-net2cloud-gap-analysis/

Thanks, Linda

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 6:12 PM
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>; Christian Jacquenet <christian.jacquenet@orange.com>; Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>; Andrew Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>; Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>; Mehmet Toy <mehmet.toy@verizon.com>
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement-04.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement-04.txt
has been successfully submitted by Linda Dunbar and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement
Revision:	04
Title:		Seamless Interconnect Underlay to Cloud Overlay Problem Statement
Document date:	2018-12-11
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		18
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement-04.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement-04
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement-04

Abstract:
   This document describes the problems of enterprises face today in
   connecting their branch offices to dynamic workloads in third party
   data centers (a.k.a. Cloud DCs).

   It examines some of the approaches for interconnecting workloads &
   applications hosted in cloud DCs with enterprises' on-premises DCs &
   branch offices. This document also describes some of the (network)
   problems that many enterprises face when they have workloads &
   applications & data split among hybrid data centers, especially for
   those enterprises with multiple sites that are already
   interconnected by VPNs (e.g. MPLS L2VPN/L3VPN) and leased lines.

   Current operational problems in the field are examined to determine
   whether there is a need for enhancements to existing protocols or
   whether a new protocol is necessary to solve them.

                                                                                  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat