Re: questions on draft-bryant-ipfrr-tunnels-01.txt

Naiming Shen <naiming@bcn-inc.net> Mon, 29 November 2004 18:34 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA17675 for <rtgwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:34:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CYqRH-0008L8-Fl for rtgwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:39:56 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CYqHu-0004Np-4u; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:30:14 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CYq9c-0003Iz-Ek for rtgwg@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:21:40 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA16565 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:21:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 67.111.75.190.ptr.us.xo.net ([67.111.75.190] helo=BCNW02.bcn-inc.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CYqEZ-00082x-Ca for rtgwg@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:26:47 -0500
Received: from [10.10.20.60] ([10.10.20.60]) by BCNW02.bcn-inc.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:21:06 -0800
Message-ID: <41AB6847.4070804@bcn-inc.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:19:51 -0800
From: Naiming Shen <naiming@bcn-inc.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040929
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20041115171224.0291bbc8@pop.avici.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20041115171224.0291bbc8@pop.avici.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20041122115220.0292ba80@pop.avici.com> <41A2297D.7080200@bcn-inc.net> <41A717D4.3080803@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <41A717D4.3080803@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Nov 2004 18:21:06.0010 (UTC) FILETIME=[30E9DBA0:01C4D640]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Alia Atlas <aatlas@avici.com>, rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: questions on draft-bryant-ipfrr-tunnels-01.txt
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: rtgwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7baded97d9887f7a0c7e8a33c2e3ea1b
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Stewart,

Stewart Bryant wrote:
> 
> 
> Naiming Shen wrote:
> 
>> Alia,
>>
>>> We need to arrive at a method that is simpler and easier to use than 
>>> RSVP-TE source-routed tunnels.  Otherwise, the only benefit we'd get 
>>> from an advanced IPFRR method is that it "isn't MPLS", and that's not 
>>> sufficient IMHO.
>>>
>>
>> It does not have to be "MPLS" if you consider the IP TE mechanism though
>> :-)
> 
> 
> Can you summarise how you steer these packets through an IP network?

I did a presentation in San Diego on IP TE, and here is the updated
draft,

  http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-shen-ip-te-rsp-03.txt

Cheers,
- Naiming

> 
> Stewart
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Rtgwg mailing list
Rtgwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg