Impact of "Network Management Datastore Architecture" (NMDA) on ietf-key-chain
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 17 April 2017 17:44 UTC
Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFD713170D; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lz4zuiFMhQvb; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15EE4131706; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2927; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1492451060; x=1493660660; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=ZEAXSmz9Kzkh3Xdebt5lPriqX0JRCQgQ5xcVZYDtVXA=; b=kbx0g53oeu9956m+QHsjAGxsmcq0iRnAXJvjf8FZsZrgRTFnfKVQ5DX5 uhLj3OYXAlTGVkr+KzwAZoqm5AJJrL4CIM5XTjquWM9IN3gOpJXHfndI/ gm2V8ALH5UcGdWF45QWYHZ9Kf1SDRKN8yVikP9Z5SVIlJ8NR47w8tFuBB g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A/AgBN/vRY/5hdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm5lYYELB4NfihWiCIU0gg8shXgcg2g/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohT9WEgEMAQ0wAgQwFxAEDoocDqsCgiaLFwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARsFiC+EZ4YOgl8FnRsBgVWRD5FGlAkBHzhYLWMVhyl1AYgNgQ0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,215,1488844800"; d="scan'208,217";a="411457328"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Apr 2017 17:44:17 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (xch-rtp-015.cisco.com [64.101.220.155]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3HHiHJZ017558 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 17 Apr 2017 17:44:17 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 13:44:16 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 13:44:16 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
CC: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Impact of "Network Management Datastore Architecture" (NMDA) on ietf-key-chain
Thread-Topic: Impact of "Network Management Datastore Architecture" (NMDA) on ietf-key-chain
Thread-Index: AQHSt6I8WwCYI94mMEy+O1Ae6VizeQ==
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 17:44:16 +0000
Message-ID: <D51A772B.A8ED9%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.197]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D51A772BA8ED9aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/pI6FH8SD3R5LQ2Ij8WwKtltZvHI>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 17:44:22 -0000
For those who are not following the draft or discussion, I’m referring to https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-01.txt After numerous meetings on the NMDA, I would assert that the ietf-key-chain model is in the category which can go directly to NMDA without any migration. I base this on the fact that given that key-chains are merely a database of lists of keys that can be updated immediately, there should be little difference between the ‘running’ and ‘intended’ datastores. Note that this is consistent with the ACL model: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-10.txt Does anyone disagree with this assertion? Thanks, Acee
- Impact of "Network Management Datastore Architect… Acee Lindem (acee)