Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-07.txt> (A YANG Data Model for Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)) to Proposed Standard

["t.petch" <[e-mail]>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Xufeng Liu" <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 9:03 PM

> Hi Tom,
>
> Thanks for pointing it out. The missing references have been added to
the new revision:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-11.


Yes, looks good.

Meanwhile, this is getting ridiculous, not you, but YANG (or perhaps
YANG has always been ridiculous:-(

I have seen two yang-doctor reviews recently commenting on references
and saying that they may have to change because the subject is under
discussion (not a discussion I see on any open list, such as that of the
NETMOD WG).

I think that what I suggested, and what you have done, conforms to the
latest revision of YANG Guidelines (which is in IETF LC) and works well
and I would resist any change thereto.  But who knows what this
discussion will come up with?  I will keep you posted.

Tom Petch

> Best regards,
> - Xufeng
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: t.petch [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 7:28 AM
> > To: Alia Atlas <[e-mail]>
> > Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
routing WG
> > <[e-mail]>
> > Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-07.txt> (A YANG
Data Model
> > for Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)) to Proposed Standard
> >
> > While I am at it...
> >
> > it would seem that this I-D, in any version thereof, lists
> >
> > RFC 2787: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Virtual Router
Redundancy
> > Protocol.
> >
> > RFC 6527: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Virtual Router
Redundancy
> > Protocol Version 3 (VRRPv3).";
> >
> > in the YANG module but these RFC do not appear in any reference,
either the
> > normative References or in the list of RFC referenced by the YANG
module.
> >
> > Tom Petch
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Alia Atlas" <[e-mail]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2018 7:28 PM
> >
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > The announcement calls them out to see if they are acceptable
> > normative
> > > references (and is now
> > > nicely automatic after too many being missed).
> > >
> > > That said - for those that have been updated, the draft should be
> > updated
> > > as well.
> > >
> > > Thanks for noticing!
> > > Alia
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 4:18 AM, t.petch <[e-mail]>
wrote:
> > >
> > > > I note that this has several downref listed in the announcement.
> > Two
> > > > these have been superseded (the I-D itself is out-of-date with
> > regard to
> > > > this as well).
> > > >
> > > > Is the announcement still valid?
> > > >
> > > > Just asking.
> > > >
> > > > Tom Petch
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "The IESG" <[e-mail]>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 4:31 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > The IESG has received a request from the Routing Area Working
> > Group WG
> > > > > (rtgwg) to consider the following document: - 'A YANG Data
Model
> > for
> > > > Virtual
> > > > > Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)'
> > > > >   <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-07.txt> as Proposed Standard
> > > > >
> > > > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and
> > solicits
> > > > final
> > > > > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to
the
> > > > > [e-mail] mailing lists by 2017-12-12. Exceptionally,
comments
> > may
> > > > be
> > > > > sent to [e-mail] instead. In either case, please retain
the
> > > > beginning of
> > > > > the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> > > > >
> > > > > Abstract
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >    This document describes a data model for Virtual Router
> > Redundancy
> > > > >    Protocol (VRRP).  Both version 2 and version 3 of VRRP are
> > covered.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The file can be obtained via
> > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/
> > > > >
> > > > > IESG discussion can be tracked via
> > > > >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/ballot/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The document contains these normative downward references.
> > > > > See RFC 3967 for additional information:
> > > > >     draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis: A YANG Data Model for
IP
> > > > Management (None - IETF stream)
> > > > >     draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis: A YANG Data Model for
> > Interface
> > > > Management (None - IETF stream)
> > > > >     draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores: Network Management
> > Datastore
> > > > Architecture (None - IETF stream)
> > > > >
> > > > >
>
>