IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-05.txt

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Tue, 24 June 2014 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4698C1A03E0 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MQIzT73yX9h7 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5938D1B2AE3 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=410; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1403634163; x=1404843763; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=xFm/Vrk/u1kYvKQ+W8vdnQvM8qpFP7xjj3fLjqfVcf0=; b=II5jEdT87L/6Vw99cSJ03sEx+vLUEZ2As8yf/4hprc1s7tXnis8p8fdt FHW5IJ7gCh34MNK4P/09jqaaUApjnjXZdkUadl4uUDbeO2lQQDwyLJMse BxBdSTTMzEKbuaPq/FOY5SLPb7LVrUGh08IlwF+rbT0o7Nj7WxyY8gIGJ w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Am0FAKTAqVOtJA2D/2dsb2JhbABZgw2BLKpABQGZOgGBChZ1hAQBAQQdHT0SAgEIDigQMiUCBAESiELLHxeFY4kghEMBBJpRk2uCAIFCgjA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,539,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="55607566"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Jun 2014 18:22:42 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com [173.36.12.87]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5OIMgP1006636 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 24 Jun 2014 18:22:42 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.198]) by xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com ([173.36.12.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:22:42 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Pushpasis Sarkar <psarkar@juniper.net>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-05.txt
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-05.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPj4ZRGrvLb3srckattm85Q624TJt/7rWQgAC1kYA=
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 18:22:41 +0000
Message-ID: <CFCF39C5.5C01C%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <20140624082840.3753.40879.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8c744efff6c148149db4cd76dcfe115b@BN1PR05MB520.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <8c744efff6c148149db4cd76dcfe115b@BN1PR05MB520.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.3]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3CF36D2C4F6D4644A7C8FEE5FB766D5E@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/taUZmUV9jSCT6KRhwKoMGUsHkEI
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 18:23:48 -0000

On 6/24/14 4:37 AM, "Pushpasis Sarkar" <psarkar@juniper.net> wrote:

Pushpasis:


Hi!

>Also we would like to re-call for WG adoption for this draft and take it
>forward as a WG document

No need to re-call for adoption.  Based on the threads on the list, it is
clear that there is interest in taking on this work.

Please republish as draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection

Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email