FW: New Version Notification for draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00.txt
"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Wed, 23 January 2013 01:26 UTC
Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9D621F8824 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:26:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PVOuNa8JWF2a for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:26:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90AB21F881A for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:26:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2346; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1358904374; x=1360113974; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ZuQ+g4ZoUYQhTvgFhfz9FQ9WY+NDvfzC1oBbkt7ZdyE=; b=T07g/EU+0qh3/E52S5mT6CATNMzP6Zbllv7w9OC1AoGb6bouUrsUqYxI BbcN3TwyeRc/unFz+ovI1vkXIBqJnZNcY4LTPE8wmCK/kgHNQGi4a1qNo Lnu+NndKS8gL10O5xc/G4EvaKROmhJ5niKYWX6mD/P67d/3Kqgwx1qQ7q k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgIFAFM7/1CtJV2d/2dsb2JhbABEhkW2X34Wc4IeAQEBBCMRQw4GAQgRBAEBAwIGHQMCBDAUAQYBAQUEAQQTCAESh34Mm1qOVYRRjhyBI48AMmEDklmET48tgmgNgiQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,518,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="166494230"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Jan 2013 01:26:13 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com [173.36.12.89]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r0N1QDjX028062 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:26:13 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.32]) by xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com ([173.36.12.89]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:26:13 -0600
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00.txt
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00.txt
Thread-Index: Ac35CGQJ25zdjKvIRSe1dp9r8ExxSw==
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:26:12 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:25:00 +0000
Message-ID: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD82FE4085C@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.154.212.137]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:26:14 -0000
Hi: This draft responds to a suggestion by Stewart during the RTGWG meeting in Atlanta. Stewart suggested that we leave a written record on the presentation comparing ARC and MRT. Since both technical solutions are subject to changes, this work can only be a snapshot that represent the best understanding/ knowledge of the authors at that particular time. It is unclear to the author whether we should maintain this document overtime or just clean it up and publish with proper caution words. What do you think? Pascal -----Original Message----- From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] Sent: lundi 21 janvier 2013 00:12 To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) Cc: srini@ece.arizona.edu Subject: New Version Notification for draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00.txt A new version of I-D, draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Pascal Thubert and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt Revision: 00 Title: Available Routing Constructs Creation date: 2013-01-21 WG ID: Individual Submission Number of pages: 18 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00.txt Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00 Abstract: This draft compares the capabilities offered by the Available Routing Construct (ARC) and the Maximally Redundant Trees (MRT) techniques in order to support applicability statements. The IETF Secretariat
- FW: New Version Notification for draft-thubert-rt… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)