dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91 rtgwg)

David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net> Mon, 20 October 2014 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <equinox@diac24.net>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1611ACE5C for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i7GRmAqkfsxS for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spaceboyz.net (spaceboyz.net [IPv6:2001:8d8:870:1000::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D00021ACE57 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2001:8d8:870:10ef:1::] (helo=jupiter.n2.diac24.net) by spaceboyz.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <equinox@diac24.net>) id 1XgJl2-0003Fm-BE; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:40:48 +0200
Received: from equinox by jupiter.n2.diac24.net with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <equinox@diac24.net>) id 1XgJkn-003PxX-At; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:40:36 +0200
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:40:33 +0200
From: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91 rtgwg)
Message-ID: <20141020204033.GD236844@jupiter.n2.diac24.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/uGXZYWFiPGN2CNyBwJlZgImi7s8
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:40:57 -0000

Hi rtgwg,


freshly submitted & soliciting for feedback are the following drafts:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lamparter-rtgwg-routing-extra-qualifiers/?include_text=1
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing/?include_text=1

These are distilled version of the SADR stuff that has been coming in
from homenet; they describe the hop-by-hop forwarding behaviour
independent of the dynamic routing protocol du jour.  The first one
describes general considerations of adding things ("extra qualifiers")
to destination longest-match, the second one does the specifics for
source match.  They're derived from baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing, and
are essentially write-ups of e-mail threads with Fred.  (Thanks!)

These are -00, so there's a lot of things to be fixed still (I'm not
even sure whether this should be 2 drafts or 1, and some bits should be
moved from -dst-src to -extra-qualifiers if it stays separate.)

I believe rtgwg is the "best" wg for this, looking at the charter this
fits "Enhancements to hop-by-hop distributed routing", though admittedly
it's neither FRR nor LFA.  I'll happily accept a redirect to another wg
(6man? homenet?) if that's deemed more appropriate.

Last but not least, I'd like to request a slot at the IETF 91 rtgwg
meeting to present these drafts.

Cheers & Thanks in advance for feedback,


-David