dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91 rtgwg)
David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net> Mon, 20 October 2014 20:40 UTC
Return-Path: <equinox@diac24.net>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1611ACE5C for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i7GRmAqkfsxS for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spaceboyz.net (spaceboyz.net [IPv6:2001:8d8:870:1000::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D00021ACE57 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2001:8d8:870:10ef:1::] (helo=jupiter.n2.diac24.net) by spaceboyz.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <equinox@diac24.net>) id 1XgJl2-0003Fm-BE; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:40:48 +0200
Received: from equinox by jupiter.n2.diac24.net with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <equinox@diac24.net>) id 1XgJkn-003PxX-At; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:40:36 +0200
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:40:33 +0200
From: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91 rtgwg)
Message-ID: <20141020204033.GD236844@jupiter.n2.diac24.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/uGXZYWFiPGN2CNyBwJlZgImi7s8
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:40:57 -0000
Hi rtgwg, freshly submitted & soliciting for feedback are the following drafts: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lamparter-rtgwg-routing-extra-qualifiers/?include_text=1 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing/?include_text=1 These are distilled version of the SADR stuff that has been coming in from homenet; they describe the hop-by-hop forwarding behaviour independent of the dynamic routing protocol du jour. The first one describes general considerations of adding things ("extra qualifiers") to destination longest-match, the second one does the specifics for source match. They're derived from baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing, and are essentially write-ups of e-mail threads with Fred. (Thanks!) These are -00, so there's a lot of things to be fixed still (I'm not even sure whether this should be 2 drafts or 1, and some bits should be moved from -dst-src to -extra-qualifiers if it stays separate.) I believe rtgwg is the "best" wg for this, looking at the charter this fits "Enhancements to hop-by-hop distributed routing", though admittedly it's neither FRR nor LFA. I'll happily accept a redirect to another wg (6man? homenet?) if that's deemed more appropriate. Last but not least, I'd like to request a slot at the IETF 91 rtgwg meeting to present these drafts. Cheers & Thanks in advance for feedback, -David
- dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91 rtgwg) David Lamparter
- Re: dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91 rtgwg) David Lamparter
- Re: dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91 rtgwg) Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91 rtgwg) Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [homenet] dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91… Tim Chown
- Re: dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91 rtgwg) David Lamparter
- Re: [homenet] dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91… David Lamparter
- Re: [homenet] dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Re: [homenet] dst/src routing drafts (for IET… Ray Hunter
- Re: [homenet] dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91… Ole Troan
- Re: [homenet] dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91… Gert Doering
- Re: [homenet] dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [homenet] dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91… Jim Gettys
- Re: [homenet] dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [homenet] dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91… Michael Richardson
- Re: [homenet] dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91… David Lamparter
- Re: [homenet] dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91… Ole Troan
- Re: [homenet] dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91… Ray Hunter