IETF Logo Mail Archive

question about draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-02

peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn Thu, 20 October 2016 08:58 UTC

Return-Path: <peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0265E12954D for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 01:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.951
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UvoxUGRMuTvh for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 01:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713C0129540 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 01:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse01.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.3.20]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTP id E98BB15132994; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:57:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id u9K8vB3F073448; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:57:12 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn)
To: stephane.litkowski@orange.com
Subject: question about draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-02
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 4AE091F6:5B59F0A7-48258052:00309A39; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.3 September 15, 2011
Message-ID: <OF4AE091F6.5B59F0A7-ON48258052.00309A39-48258052.0031BC89@zte.com.cn>
From: peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:03:22 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2016-10-20 16:57:12, Serialize complete at 2016-10-20 16:57:12
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0031BC8648258052_="
X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn u9K8vB3F073448
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/zMNM9nD6gwPQznMmS_c980pgtDE>
Cc: chen.minyu@zte.com.cn, rtgwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 08:58:03 -0000

Hi Stephane,

I find that section “4.4.2.  Link up event” of 
draft-litkowski-rtgwg-uloop-delay-04 has been removed. 
Does it mean that there is no need for this?

Thanks,
Deccan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email