Re: [Rucus] Reading list for BoF

"Saverio Niccolini" <Saverio.Niccolini@nw.neclab.eu> Mon, 18 February 2008 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <rucus-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rucus-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rucus-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF2828C420; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:43:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.418
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.418 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ua+wjm5zAc5o; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:43:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B685B28C40B; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:43:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rucus@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rucus@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A96C28C416 for <rucus@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:43:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GgyjXTMLhjJD for <rucus@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:43:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu (smtp0.neclab.eu [195.37.70.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E124728C35F for <rucus@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:43:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.office [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1A52C00C336 for <rucus@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:43:21 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas2.office)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas2.office [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id psEd7uiGCisO for <rucus@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:43:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mx1.office (mx1.office [10.1.1.23]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B0E2C000355 for <rucus@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:43:16 +0100 (CET)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:43:15 +0100
Message-ID: <5F6519BF2DE0404D99B7C75607FF76FF4D1001@mx1.office>
In-Reply-To: <5F6519BF2DE0404D99B7C75607FF76FF4D0FF6@mx1.office>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Rucus] Reading list for BoF
Thread-Index: AchyQBxZDSqWpfgaSdKzPXbwMUshrAAABwVAAABwSbAAAIjg8A==
References: <5F6519BF2DE0404D99B7C75607FF76FF4D0FED@mx1.office><5FB585F183235B42A9E70095055136FB798528@DEMUEXC012.nsn-intra.net> <5F6519BF2DE0404D99B7C75607FF76FF4D0FF6@mx1.office>
From: Saverio Niccolini <Saverio.Niccolini@nw.neclab.eu>
To: rucus BoF <rucus@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Rucus] Reading list for BoF
X-BeenThere: rucus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <rucus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rucus>, <mailto:rucus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/rucus>
List-Post: <mailto:rucus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rucus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rucus>, <mailto:rucus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: rucus-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rucus-bounces@ietf.org

Hi, 

David just submitted a problem statement draft which I think it is interesting to read:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-schwartz-rucus-problem-statement-01.txt
(even if my view is more to see RFC5039 as problem statement document legitimating RUCUS)

where there are some nice points made that are also reflected in:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-seedorf-sipping-spam-score-semantics-00.txt

I see a very important point written there: "Unwanted communication is subjective - not objective"

This is really true and we can not forget it when talking about RUCUS.

A sentence taken from the spam score semantice draft also raises the issue:
"Whether a message is spam or not is not a binary proposition, both
in terms of identifying it (mechanisms will have false positives
and false negatives) and even in judging it (e.g., depending on
user preferences)."

Saverio

============================================================
Dr. Saverio Niccolini
Senior Researcher
NEC Laboratories Europe, Network Research Division	
Kurfuerstenanlage 36, D-69115 Heidelberg
Tel.     +49 (0)6221 4342-118
Fax:     +49 (0)6221 4342-155
e-mail:  saverio.niccolini@nw.neclab.eu <-- !!! NEW ADDRESS !!!
============================================================
NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria
Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014
 
  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rucus-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rucus-bounces@ietf.org] 
> On Behalf Of Saverio Niccolini
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 4:30 PM
> To: rucus BoF
> Subject: Re: [Rucus] Reading list for BoF
> 
> Hi,
> 
> there are already some drafts out:
> 
> -- new version for SPITSTOP draft (-01)
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-niccolini-sipping-spitstop-01
> -- new version of the spam score draft (-01)
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-sipping-spam-score-01
> -- new draft on spam score semantics (-00)
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-seedorf-sipping-spam
> -score-semantics-00.txt
> -- new draft on SIP spam feedback (-00)
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-niccolini-sipping-spam-feedback-00
> 
> Also an update to the CAPTCHA draft based on recent discussion
> will follow, link will be posted as soons as it is submitted.
> 
> Cheers,
> Saverio
> 
> ============================================================
> Dr. Saverio Niccolini
> Senior Researcher
> NEC Laboratories Europe, Network Research Division	
> Kurfuerstenanlage 36, D-69115 Heidelberg
> Tel.     +49 (0)6221 4342-118
> Fax:     +49 (0)6221 4342-155
> e-mail:  saverio.niccolini@nw.neclab.eu <-- !!! NEW ADDRESS !!!
> ============================================================
> NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria
> Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014
>  
>   
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rucus-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rucus-bounces@ietf.org] 
> > On Behalf Of Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 4:10 PM
> > To: Martin Stiemerling; rucus BoF
> > Subject: Re: [Rucus] Reading list for BoF
> > 
> > FYI, we are going to have more documents after the draft 
> > submission deadline. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: rucus-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rucus-bounces@ietf.org] 
> > Im Auftrag 
> > > von ext Martin Stiemerling
> > > Gesendet: Montag, 18. Februar 2008 17:08
> > > An: rucus BoF
> > > Betreff: [Rucus] Reading list for BoF
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I'm currently trying to get an overview about what has 
> > happened in the 
> > > field of SPIT mitigation, i.e., editing a useful reading 
> > list for the 
> > > rucus bof.
> > > 
> > > Some possible documents to read:
> > > - RFC 5039
> > > - SIP Extensions for SPIT identification
> > > (draft-niccolini-sipping-feedback-spit-03)
> > > - Signaling TO Prevent SPIT (SPITSTOP) Reference Scenario
> > > draft-niccolini-sipping-spitstop-01)
> > > - Completely Automated Public Turing Test to Tell Computers 
> > and Humans 
> > > Apart (CAPTCHA) based Robot Challenges for the Session Initiation 
> > > Protocol (SIP)
> > > (draft-tschofenig-sipping-captcha-00.txt)
> > > - A Framework to tackle Spam and Unwanted Communication for 
> > > Internet                        Telephony 
> > > (draft-tschofenig-sipping-framework-spit-reduction-02.txt)
> > > A Document Format for Expressing Authorization Policies to 
> > tackle Spam 
> > > and Unwanted Communication for Internet Telephony
> > > (draft-tschofenig-sipping-spit-policy-02.txt)
> > > - Spam feedback for SIP 
> > (draft-niccolini-sipping-spam-feedback-00.txt)
> > > - Spam Score for SIP (draft-wing-sipping-spam-score-01.txt)
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   Martin
> > > 
> > > 
> > > stiemerling@nw.neclab.eu   <== NEW ADDRESS
> > > 
> > > NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division
> > > 
> > > NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria 
> > > Road, London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Rucus mailing list
> > > Rucus@ietf.org
> > > http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rucus
> > > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rucus mailing list
> > Rucus@ietf.org
> > http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rucus
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Rucus mailing list
> Rucus@ietf.org
> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rucus
> 
_______________________________________________
Rucus mailing list
Rucus@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rucus