IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-rue-01

James Hamlin <james.hamlin@purple.us> Fri, 13 September 2019 14:42 UTC

Return-Path: <james.hamlin@purple.us>
X-Original-To: rum@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rum@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396D8120875 for <rum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 07:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ty9rnvAScPFT for <rum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 07:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1pmail.ess.barracuda.com (1pmail.ess.barracuda.com [209.222.82.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9240120868 for <rum@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 07:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.purple.us (unknown [208.17.91.143]) by mx8.us-east-2b.ess.aws.cudaops.com (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:42:25 +0000
Received: from 1-WP-402-EXCH.purplenetwork.net (10.0.10.144) by 1-wp-401-exch.purplenetwork.net (10.0.10.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 07:40:48 -0700
Received: from 1-WP-402-EXCH.purplenetwork.net ([fe80::b41b:40df:b152:6817]) by 1-wp-402-exch.purplenetwork.net ([fe80::b41b:40df:b152:6817%27]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 07:40:48 -0700
From: James Hamlin <james.hamlin@purple.us>
To: "rum@ietf.org" <rum@ietf.org>
CC: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Thread-Topic: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-rue-01
Thread-Index: AQHVakA0i+jQ6mMMhEOX6Gd2YqSgdw==
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:40:48 +0000
Message-ID: <1568385648772.69603@purple.us>
References: <f3c1d9fe-8785-86e9-4220-e7d7971b29d4@alum.mit.edu>, <ef8dec34-af0d-d4e4-be33-a28a0c9bd0b4@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <ef8dec34-af0d-d4e4-be33-a28a0c9bd0b4@alum.mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.0.10.15]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BESS-ID: 1568385740-893015-29978-26766-1
X-BESS-VER: 2019.1_20190912.1934
X-BESS-Apparent-Source-IP: 208.17.91.143
X-BESS-Outbound-Spam-Score: 0.00
X-BESS-Outbound-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.218377 [from cloudscan11-190.us-east-2a.ess.aws.cudaops.com] Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------- 0.00 BSF_BESS_OUTBOUND META: BESS Outbound
X-BESS-Outbound-Spam-Status: SCORE=0.00 using global scores of KILL_LEVEL=7.0 tests=BSF_BESS_OUTBOUND
X-BESS-BRTS-Status: 1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rum/kq5P-hLfQU82zotHpFrWO5fUIsQ>
Subject: Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-rue-01
X-BeenThere: rum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Relay User Machine <rum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rum>, <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rum/>
List-Post: <mailto:rum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rum>, <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:42:33 -0000

Paul

I think we agreed that OPUS and VP8 wouldn't need to be supported on the provider side, for good reasons. The draft proposed for adoption seems to contradict this with "RUE and Providers MUST" in sections 7.3 and 7.4 .

Is the procedure that the document is adopted, with some agreed changes missing, and then amended?
 
Best regards

James
________________________________________
From: Rum <rum-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Sent: 10 September 2019 20:53
To: rum@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-rue-01

Reminder,

This call for adoption will end next Sunday. All responses so far have
been in support, but there haven't been a lot of them. If you haven't
yet responded, please do.

        Thanks,
        Paul, as RUM co-chair

On 8/29/19 9:50 AM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> This is a call for the adoption of draft-rosen-rue-01 as a RUM wg
> document. This is intended to evolve into the document our charter calls
> for.
>
> Comments, pro or con, on this proposal are due by Sunday September 15.
>
>      Thanks,
>      Paul Kyzivat, as RUM co-chair
>

--
Rum mailing list
Rum@ietf.org
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.ietf.org%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2frum&c=E,1,XvDLRFtOorYTD_ZHqiyi_6x1eB_6gpdbTan7J17J5oZXHwBsGhr18IwuVwzvg_zkMdHAf0ubd1nNm-m4DNvAqH2M7I7ipp3wdXgwAUBL0XHEd7ncuIhgpdZkwg,,&typo=0

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email