IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rum] Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-rum-rue-09

Isaac Roach <iroach@gmail.com> Wed, 15 December 2021 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <iroach@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rum@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rum@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D5E3A0768; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:28:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oot_xzfS9q7C; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:28:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oo1-xc34.google.com (mail-oo1-xc34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF1B83A0766; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:28:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oo1-xc34.google.com with SMTP id w15-20020a4a354f000000b002d85ef0533dso1717216oog.7; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:28:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=voCGfs1io9Yj+46YRVCcHv0/2vNA7J3+7z0ou36WH/E=; b=ia4ZsZZGaZicTjV6c+yIgyP3t18Ev6Uo3mC3S5JHhwXVBSbY4JZc6XSiNWmUe+dW8s 8RLcacysoQw0WEhjlQu1k1lF3sAt3Tb4Tzv65ZGC8PrVGu1dTU8h3lft+IOzRQ44Xj96 sITvHH0ySVBUZ5tFtAHIgj9NIYW1W88/kvMoVjt5g+AWKbWje6255rgllbFRaYYFtnko aaWL2CJqVTTauRx42s5rFeaTgRnvbGi5uLiG1RavI9M++lgS2MymhHJ03STW07YIRzKU 7cNBkrcQqw9Daw/bJTgz6F/b9iTJtZNInUKgyGldUiRcjNzlPm+0UgWIuT7RsVn+x2wl YqPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=voCGfs1io9Yj+46YRVCcHv0/2vNA7J3+7z0ou36WH/E=; b=ch0UqcpJYdDla/SdgURPWNeqOGJmAYZkxpLeDFME1I3mISTc2sZDSYEWC2dClci/iO GFPqTlbLt7d3bClfvIBtB/a5wnBYX10rMtj8CabFVkGB7csiP4RzOzpHkn4COqIKASuX BNWsulSXag2a1hHqGZvkatxupO5nKctUlvGtZUozFpp8Kav3FsDVfE/283JKwx6LAIq7 nx/PpEEMsFCQzzOYEayRXR8Ywh9dHJRLsg5OsRFg5Nx7XSxA3pdb0L0+U2mGAXH1321P b6XMhL8uRngqkmUOm7GKPrG+PEQq3gf+P3SAxI4ElLUAy5CO7zo+qJdAN0QTL0h0I+PK Y6+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Zyy9BvGTtXS8wIHaIzmr+9SCriQUZgzK0aEkF/F1vsb0IJREO 0CFut8E7v9wdiYeLDqllWrQWEXVTV3dMJV8YZXA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzWRFY+1AHk9muHwvMalSo2DCMtkgShKiv12+5vfK+Qg+p0ewXluNVH2lVTvvueKwANlqjBtfLyfY2gUgJfNLE=
X-Received: by 2002:a4a:41c3:: with SMTP id x186mr9268355ooa.76.1639610900632; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:28:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <84671419-6CBF-4EE4-9A85-383415220735@brianrosen.net> <57C0B456-E2A5-4282-96A7-66984B01332B@gmail.com> <0dc8776a-27f4-14aa-f336-013673830a3c@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <0dc8776a-27f4-14aa-f336-013673830a3c@alum.mit.edu>
Reply-To: iroach@gmail.com
From: Isaac Roach <iroach@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 16:28:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKewAXWk0iTAA0pHwgZ_Pt5-wjLXTgqiBFPJfp70vBfeT+yKzw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>, tsv-art@ietf.org, rum@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rum-rue.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004d574105d337a920"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rum/uFafaGVroFYQdkoKtm-tzu5wtuQ>
Subject: Re: [Rum] Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-rum-rue-09
X-BeenThere: rum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Relay User Machine <rum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rum>, <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rum/>
List-Post: <mailto:rum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rum>, <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 23:28:28 -0000

I think these concerns validate many of the issues previously raised that
have not been resolved.

Thanks,

Isaac

On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 6:03 PM Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> On 12/3/21 1:29 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
>
> >> I don’t see anything in 8835 that requires dual stack.
> >
> > [BA] 8835 does require being able to handle IPv6 addresses and
> candidates. But again, those requirements would apply to the WebRTC side of
> the gateway, not necessarily to the “RUE” side.
>
> I think there may be some confusion here. The idea is that both IPv4 and
> IPv6 MUST be supported. But a dual stack implementation isn't required.
> In lieu of that it is sufficient to have DNS route the SIP call to
> separate sip servers for IPv4 and IPv6. And then each of those could
> then support media of the same flavor as the sip.
>
>         Thanks,
>         Paul
>
> --
> Rum mailing list
> Rum@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rum
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email